Differences in the Initial Thermal Decomposition Mechanisms of Isomeric Nitrogen-Rich Energetic Compounds: A First-Principles Study of DTDA and T-N10B
Abstract As novel isomeric nitrogen-rich energetic materials (NREMs), 1,2-di(2′H-[1,5′-bitetrazol]-5-yl) diazene (DTDA) and 2,2′-azobis(1,5′-bitetrazole) (T-N10B) have attracted considerable attention due to their excellent detonation performance. In this study, first-principles molecular dynamics simulations were employed to systematically investigate the differences in their initial thermal decomposition mechanisms. Results show that both T-N10B and DTDA share three major initial decomposition pathways, but T-N10B tends to initiate via inner/outer tetrazole ring-opening, while DTDA prefers H atom dissociation and inner ring-opening. After initial decomposition, T-N10B releases large amounts of N2 in the subsequent two steps, whereas DTDA still undergoes extensive H atom dissociation/transfer, leading to less N2 release. Notably, both molecules have specific tetrazole ring-opening sites. Furthermore, the significant H-transfer reactions during the early stage and the better tetrazole ring stability are key to DTDA’s superior thermal stability, making it decompose more slowly than T-N10B. These findings will deepen the understanding of the energy release mechanism of tetrazole-based NREMs and provide important insights for the design of novel NREMs.
Authors
- Shuhai Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8779-7424)
- Guangrui Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6717-8813)
- Shuangfei Zhu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1691-5745)
- Zeyuan Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4504-7108)
- Yahong Chen
Institutions
- North University of China (CN)
- North China University of Technology (CN)
- Taiyuan University of Science and Technology (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
- Published
- 2026-09-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.6c03918
- Primary Topic
- Energetic Materials and Combustion
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00