Patent license prediction using deep survival analysis: A comparative study

Objective We evaluate deep survival analysis frameworks for patent licensing prediction, systematically comparing cure rate models against standard approaches and quantifying the benefit of temporal modeling over static classification to address unresolved methodological questions following recent applications of neural survival models to patent contexts. Methods We conducted experimental validation on 624,129 United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) patents (2016–2017), comparing classical Cox regression, deep neural network baseline, DeepSurv (neural Cox proportional hazards), and Cox cure rate models. Performance was evaluated using Recall@K metrics across 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year prediction horizons, with statistical significance assessed through patent-level bootstrap resampling ( B = 1,000). Results All deep learning approaches achieve high performance (Recall@10% 89.8–91.9%), substantially outperforming classical Cox regression (70.6–72.3%). Among neural architectures, DeepSurv—a standard neural Cox proportional hazards model—offers the optimal balance of simplicity and performance. More complex cure rate extensions provided no clear additional benefit over standard DeepSurv within the scope of this study: although bootstrap resampling detected a small but statistically significant difference (0.70 percentage points), this gap is practically negligible for patent screening, suggesting that explicit population heterogeneity modeling offers limited practical gains when deep feature learning is employed. Survival modeling provides statistically detectable but modest gains over static binary classification (Recall@10% differences of 0.5–1.6 percentage points), indicating that the primary value stems from capturing complex patent characteristics rather than explicit temporal modeling. Conclusion This study provides, to the best of our knowledge, the first systematic evaluation of cure rate models and temporal modeling benefits for patent licensing prediction, demonstrating that architectural simplicity (DeepSurv) achieves near-optimal performance (Recall@10% 91%) when deep feature learning is prioritized. The findings offer actionable guidance for patent portfolio management: invest in feature learning infrastructure rather than architectural sophistication.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0355826
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property and Patents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patent license prediction using deep survival analysis: A comparative study

Takao Arai, Hiroyasu Inoue
PLoS ONE
Intellectual Property and Patents
article

Patent license prediction using deep survival analysis: A comparative study

Takao Arai, Hiroyasu Inoue
article en

Abstract

Objective We evaluate deep survival analysis frameworks for patent licensing prediction, systematically comparing cure rate models against standard approaches and quantifying the benefit of temporal modeling over static classification to address unresolved methodological questions following recent applications of neural survival models to patent contexts. Methods We conducted experimental validation on 624,129 United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) patents (2016–2017), comparing classical Cox regression, deep neural network baseline, DeepSurv (neural Cox proportional hazards), and Cox cure rate models. Performance was evaluated using Recall@K metrics across 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year prediction horizons, with statistical significance assessed through patent-level bootstrap resampling ( B = 1,000). Results All deep learning approaches achieve high performance (Recall@10% 89.8–91.9%), substantially outperforming classical Cox regression (70.6–72.3%). Among neural architectures, DeepSurv—a standard neural Cox proportional hazards model—offers the optimal balance of simplicity and performance. More complex cure rate extensions provided no clear additional benefit over standard DeepSurv within the scope of this study: although bootstrap resampling detected a small but statistically significant difference (0.70 percentage points), this gap is practically negligible for patent screening, suggesting that explicit population heterogeneity modeling offers limited practical gains when deep feature learning is employed. Survival modeling provides statistically detectable but modest gains over static binary classification (Recall@10% differences of 0.5–1.6 percentage points), indicating that the primary value stems from capturing complex patent characteristics rather than explicit temporal modeling. Conclusion This study provides, to the best of our knowledge, the first systematic evaluation of cure rate models and temporal modeling benefits for patent licensing prediction, demonstrating that architectural simplicity (DeepSurv) achieves near-optimal performance (Recall@10% 91%) when deep feature learning is prioritized. The findings offer actionable guidance for patent portfolio management: invest in feature learning infrastructure rather than architectural sophistication.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(9)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Intellectual Property and Patents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.