Impact of Process Improvement Interventions on Emergency Blood Component Utilization: A Before–After Clinical Audit from South India

Background: Emergency release of blood, often involving uncrossmatched O negative or group-compatible packed red blood cells (PRBCs), is vital for trauma and non-trauma cases where immediate transfusion is needed.Optimal utilization of blood components during emergencies improves patient outcomes.The study assessed the impact of a structured quality improvement program on emergency blood release (EBR) practices, including indications, documentation, turnaround time (TAT), appropriateness, and blood component use.Study design and methods: A two-phase clinical audit was conducted at a tertiary care center in South India after audit committee clearance.Phase I retrospectively analyzed emergency release forms (ERFs) from January 2019 to December 2023 (5 years).A revised ERF with additional parameters was introduced in January 2024, followed by phase II-prospective analysis for 12 months post-training of staff and clinical users.Results: Phase I documented 221 emergency release requests (1.06%), compared with 101 requests in phase II (2.2 %).Medical indications constituted the majority in both phases, increasing from 64.7% in phase I to 88.1% in phase II.Across both phases, upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding remained the most common indication (49%), followed by road traffic accidents (RTAs) (8%), with the emergency room (ER) being the most frequent location of request.In phase II, TAT showed a median of 4 minutes, and documentation of indications and transfusion triggers improved significantly.Bleeding was the most common trigger (66%).Massive transfusion rates decreased (37.1-10.8%),alongside reduced use of fresh frozen plasma (FFP), platelets, and cryoprecipitate (p < 0.05).No cases of alloimmunization or adverse reactions were noted during the study.Discussion: Standardized documentation, well-defined transfusion triggers, and effective interdepartmental coordination are essential to ensure the judicious use of emergency blood components.Mandatory and timely blood grouping and typing for high-risk patients can reduce unnecessary O negative utilization and enhance transfusion safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5005/jotih-11062-0010
Primary Topic
Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Impact of Process Improvement Interventions on Emergency Blood Component Utilization: A Before–After Clinical Audit from South India

Deepthi Krishna Gundrajukuppam, Amal F Sam, Deepti Sachan, Jyotsnaa GVM Rao
Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
article

Impact of Process Improvement Interventions on Emergency Blood Component Utilization: A Before–After Clinical Audit from South India

Deepthi Krishna Gundrajukuppam, Amal F Sam, Deepti Sachan, Jyotsnaa GVM Rao
article en

Abstract

Background: Emergency release of blood, often involving uncrossmatched O negative or group-compatible packed red blood cells (PRBCs), is vital for trauma and non-trauma cases where immediate transfusion is needed.Optimal utilization of blood components during emergencies improves patient outcomes.The study assessed the impact of a structured quality improvement program on emergency blood release (EBR) practices, including indications, documentation, turnaround time (TAT), appropriateness, and blood component use.Study design and methods: A two-phase clinical audit was conducted at a tertiary care center in South India after audit committee clearance.Phase I retrospectively analyzed emergency release forms (ERFs) from January 2019 to December 2023 (5 years).A revised ERF with additional parameters was introduced in January 2024, followed by phase II-prospective analysis for 12 months post-training of staff and clinical users.Results: Phase I documented 221 emergency release requests (1.06%), compared with 101 requests in phase II (2.2 %).Medical indications constituted the majority in both phases, increasing from 64.7% in phase I to 88.1% in phase II.Across both phases, upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding remained the most common indication (49%), followed by road traffic accidents (RTAs) (8%), with the emergency room (ER) being the most frequent location of request.In phase II, TAT showed a median of 4 minutes, and documentation of indications and transfusion triggers improved significantly.Bleeding was the most common trigger (66%).Massive transfusion rates decreased (37.1-10.8%),alongside reduced use of fresh frozen plasma (FFP), platelets, and cryoprecipitate (p < 0.05).No cases of alloimmunization or adverse reactions were noted during the study.Discussion: Standardized documentation, well-defined transfusion triggers, and effective interdepartmental coordination are essential to ensure the judicious use of emergency blood components.Mandatory and timely blood grouping and typing for high-risk patients can reduce unnecessary O negative utilization and enhance transfusion safety.

Vol. 1(1)
Bharath University (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Impact of Process Improvement Interventions on Emergency Blood Component Utilization: A Before–After Clinical Audit from South India — Deepthi Krishna Gundrajukuppam, Amal F Sam, et al. · (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS