Field evaluation of artificial intelligence early warning for bird depredation at carp ponds

Abstract Piscivorous birds such as the great cormorant ( Phalacrocorax carbo ) can cause substantial losses in pond aquaculture, yet continuous on‐site vigilance is difficult under labor shortages. We evaluated whether an artificial intelligence‐based early‐warning system could be feasibly integrated into bird‐depredation management at a commercial common carp ( Cyprinus carpio ) farm under labor‐limited field conditions. Our primary focus was operational feasibility: linking existing surveillance cameras, screen‐captured regions of interest, cloud‐based multimodal inference, and Discord/email notifications into a workflow that could support targeted pond checks. As secondary evaluations, we quantified preliminary classification performance using 100 field screenshots and compared the multimodal generative model with an untuned COCO‐pretrained You Only Look Once version 11 (YOLO11) detector. Four Internet Protocol (IP) cameras continuously monitored the ponds, and a Python application captured predefined regions of interest from the camera‐viewer screen and sent the screenshots to the multimodal generative model via the OpenAI application programming interface (API) for binary classification of bird presence or absence. When birds were detected, the system automatically notified the farmer via Discord or email with the image and the model's textual rationale. During the main early‐morning monitoring period, producer‐reported observations suggested that alerts helped shift monitoring away from continuous video watching toward targeted pond checks. In a preliminary evaluation using 100 field screenshots (50 positive/50 negative), the multimodal generative model (o4‐mini) achieved an accuracy of 0.71, precision of 0.96, and recall of 0.44, while the YOLO11 detector achieved an accuracy of 0.52, precision of 1.00, and recall of 0.04 under low‐light conditions. The average inference cost was 0.002 USD per query, corresponding to 18.6 USD per month at 300 inferences per day. We discuss operational implications of high‐precision/low‐recall behavior and propose year‐round, log‐based monitoring to support parameter tuning and future migration to dedicated edge‐deployed detectors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.70050
Primary Topic
Avian ecology and behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Field evaluation of artificial intelligence early warning for bird depredation at carp ponds

Tomohiro Mori, Shigeru Ichiura
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Avian ecology and behavior
article

Field evaluation of artificial intelligence early warning for bird depredation at carp ponds

Tomohiro Mori, Shigeru Ichiura
article en

Abstract

Abstract Piscivorous birds such as the great cormorant ( Phalacrocorax carbo ) can cause substantial losses in pond aquaculture, yet continuous on‐site vigilance is difficult under labor shortages. We evaluated whether an artificial intelligence‐based early‐warning system could be feasibly integrated into bird‐depredation management at a commercial common carp ( Cyprinus carpio ) farm under labor‐limited field conditions. Our primary focus was operational feasibility: linking existing surveillance cameras, screen‐captured regions of interest, cloud‐based multimodal inference, and Discord/email notifications into a workflow that could support targeted pond checks. As secondary evaluations, we quantified preliminary classification performance using 100 field screenshots and compared the multimodal generative model with an untuned COCO‐pretrained You Only Look Once version 11 (YOLO11) detector. Four Internet Protocol (IP) cameras continuously monitored the ponds, and a Python application captured predefined regions of interest from the camera‐viewer screen and sent the screenshots to the multimodal generative model via the OpenAI application programming interface (API) for binary classification of bird presence or absence. When birds were detected, the system automatically notified the farmer via Discord or email with the image and the model's textual rationale. During the main early‐morning monitoring period, producer‐reported observations suggested that alerts helped shift monitoring away from continuous video watching toward targeted pond checks. In a preliminary evaluation using 100 field screenshots (50 positive/50 negative), the multimodal generative model (o4‐mini) achieved an accuracy of 0.71, precision of 0.96, and recall of 0.44, while the YOLO11 detector achieved an accuracy of 0.52, precision of 1.00, and recall of 0.04 under low‐light conditions. The average inference cost was 0.002 USD per query, corresponding to 18.6 USD per month at 300 inferences per day. We discuss operational implications of high‐precision/low‐recall behavior and propose year‐round, log‐based monitoring to support parameter tuning and future migration to dedicated edge‐deployed detectors.

Wildlife Society Bulletin
Yamagata University (JP), Horiba (Japan) (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Avian ecology and behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.