A Time-saving and Effective Technique Using SURGICEL™ Packing for Controlling Bleeding During Spinal Endoscopy Surgery

Abstract Background: Epidural venous bleeding during full-endoscopic lumbar decompression can obscure visualization, prolong operative time, and increase the risk of neural injury. Conventional hemostatic methods, such as bipolar cautery, carry a risk of thermal spread, while other hemostatic agents have limitations related to swelling, cost, or application complexity. Objectives: This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of the Surgicel™ packing technique for epidural venous bleeding control during spinal endoscopic decompression. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 40 patients undergoing lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression for central lumbar spinal stenosis at a regional hospital in Taiwan. Sixteen patients (24 levels) received the Surgicel™ packing technique, and 24 patients (36 levels) served as controls. Operative time, mean arterial pressure (MAP) at admission and intraoperatively, use of additional hemostatic agents, and complications were recorded. Results: The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the Surgicel™ group compared with controls (72.5 ± 9.7 vs. 89.0 ± 11.6 min, P < 0.005). Additional hemostatic agents were required in 6.25% of Surgicel™ patients versus 33.3% of controls ( P < 0.005). No significant differences were found in preoperative or intraoperative MAP between groups. All epidural venous bleeding in the Surgicel™ group was controlled without recurrence. No complications, including dural tears, new-onset neuralgia, or delayed bleeding, were reported. Conclusions: The Surgicel™ packing technique is a safe, efficient, and cost-effective method for controlling epidural venous bleeding during full-endoscopic lumbar decompression. It reduces operative time and the need for additional hemostatic agents, with no observed complications. This technique may improve surgical efficiency. However, prospective, multicenter studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/fjmd.fjmd-d-25-00042
Primary Topic
Spinal Hematomas and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Time-saving and Effective Technique Using SURGICEL™ Packing for Controlling Bleeding During Spinal Endoscopy Surgery

Pao-Lung Chang, Chun Tseng, Yuan‐Shun Lo, Chien-Ying Lai et al.
Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders
Spinal Hematomas and Complications
article

A Time-saving and Effective Technique Using SURGICEL™ Packing for Controlling Bleeding During Spinal Endoscopy Surgery

Pao-Lung Chang, Chun Tseng, Yuan‐Shun Lo, Chien-Ying Lai, Ling-Yi Li, Michael Jian-Wen Chen, Hsien-Te Chen, Chia-Yu Lin, Pang-Hsuan Hsiao, Chien-Wei Wu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Epidural venous bleeding during full-endoscopic lumbar decompression can obscure visualization, prolong operative time, and increase the risk of neural injury. Conventional hemostatic methods, such as bipolar cautery, carry a risk of thermal spread, while other hemostatic agents have limitations related to swelling, cost, or application complexity. Objectives: This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of the Surgicel™ packing technique for epidural venous bleeding control during spinal endoscopic decompression. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 40 patients undergoing lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression for central lumbar spinal stenosis at a regional hospital in Taiwan. Sixteen patients (24 levels) received the Surgicel™ packing technique, and 24 patients (36 levels) served as controls. Operative time, mean arterial pressure (MAP) at admission and intraoperatively, use of additional hemostatic agents, and complications were recorded. Results: The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the Surgicel™ group compared with controls (72.5 ± 9.7 vs. 89.0 ± 11.6 min, P < 0.005). Additional hemostatic agents were required in 6.25% of Surgicel™ patients versus 33.3% of controls ( P < 0.005). No significant differences were found in preoperative or intraoperative MAP between groups. All epidural venous bleeding in the Surgicel™ group was controlled without recurrence. No complications, including dural tears, new-onset neuralgia, or delayed bleeding, were reported. Conclusions: The Surgicel™ packing technique is a safe, efficient, and cost-effective method for controlling epidural venous bleeding during full-endoscopic lumbar decompression. It reduces operative time and the need for additional hemostatic agents, with no observed complications. This technique may improve surgical efficiency. However, prospective, multicenter studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders
China Medical University (TW), China Medical University Beigang Hospital (TW), China Medical University Hospital (TW)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Spinal Hematomas and Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.