Early recurrence patterns after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A multicenter study

OBJECTIVE: To compare early recurrence patterns and survival outcomes between neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCIT) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 1428 patients with stage IIB-IVA ESCC who underwent NCIT or NCRT followed by radical surgery. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, and post-recurrence survival (PRS). Propensity score matching (1:1 ratio, 0.1 caliper; balance threshold: standardized mean difference <0.10) and multivariable Cox regression were utilized. RESULTS: After propensity score matching (532 patients per group), the NCIT group exhibited better 3-year OS (72.2% vs 60.9%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.85; P < .001) and RFS (67.8% vs. 59.3%; HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57-0.86; P < .001) than the NCRT group. The NCIT group also had lower rates of early overall recurrence (131 [24.6%] vs. 196 [36.8%]; P < .001) and early distant metastasis (73 [13.7%] vs. 125 [23.5%]; P < .001) than the NCRT group. Multivariable regression analysis identified NCRT (vs NCIT), higher ypN stage, and not achieving a major pathological response as independent risk factors for both early overall recurrence and early distant metastasis. Among patients who experienced early recurrence, PRS did not differ between the two modalities (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.63-1.04; P = .086). Although the NCRT group had a higher major pathological response rate, NCIT was associated with better early recurrence control even among patients achieving major pathological response (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.84; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with NCRT, NCIT is associated with a lower incidence of early recurrence, particularly distant metastasis, which may contribute to the observed OS advantage. The poor prognosis after early recurrence highlights the need for intensified postoperative surveillance in high-risk patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezag219
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early recurrence patterns after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A multicenter study

Huilai Lv, Qinya Wang, Chunji Chen, Hainan Chen et al.
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Early recurrence patterns after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A multicenter study

Huilai Lv, Qinya Wang, Chunji Chen, Hainan Chen, Minhua Ye, Chunguo Wang, Zimin Wang, Jiawen Chen, Jiahua Lv, Qianyi Chen, Zhengyang Zhang, Chengchu Zhu, Q. Zhong, Cien Sun, Liwei Xu, Hua Sun, Ziqiang Tian, Zhichao Liu, Zhigang Li, Dong Qian, William C Cho, Jinbo Zhao, Dehua Ma, Qifeng Wang, Xinyu Mei, Jianfei Shen, Youhua Jiang, Xufeng Guo, Changchun Wang, Hao Liu, Xiaolong Yan, Xuefeng Leng, Xiaoyang Li, Yongtao Han, Jiangbo Lin
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare early recurrence patterns and survival outcomes between neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCIT) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 1428 patients with stage IIB-IVA ESCC who underwent NCIT or NCRT followed by radical surgery. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, and post-recurrence survival (PRS). Propensity score matching (1:1 ratio, 0.1 caliper; balance threshold: standardized mean difference <0.10) and multivariable Cox regression were utilized. RESULTS: After propensity score matching (532 patients per group), the NCIT group exhibited better 3-year OS (72.2% vs 60.9%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.85; P < .001) and RFS (67.8% vs. 59.3%; HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57-0.86; P < .001) than the NCRT group. The NCIT group also had lower rates of early overall recurrence (131 [24.6%] vs. 196 [36.8%]; P < .001) and early distant metastasis (73 [13.7%] vs. 125 [23.5%]; P < .001) than the NCRT group. Multivariable regression analysis identified NCRT (vs NCIT), higher ypN stage, and not achieving a major pathological response as independent risk factors for both early overall recurrence and early distant metastasis. Among patients who experienced early recurrence, PRS did not differ between the two modalities (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.63-1.04; P = .086). Although the NCRT group had a higher major pathological response rate, NCIT was associated with better early recurrence control even among patients achieving major pathological response (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.84; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with NCRT, NCIT is associated with a lower incidence of early recurrence, particularly distant metastasis, which may contribute to the observed OS advantage. The poor prognosis after early recurrence highlights the need for intensified postoperative surveillance in high-risk patients.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Hebei Medical University (CN), University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Wenzhou Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (CN), Shanghai Chest Hospital (CN), Jiaxing University (CN), Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (CN), Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University (CN), Queen Elizabeth Hospital (GB), Sichuan Cancer Hospital (CN), Taizhou Central Hospital (CN), First Hospital of Jiaxing (CN), Union Hospital (US), Tang Du Hospital (CN), Zhejiang Taizhou Hospital (CN), Union Hospital (CN), Taizhou University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.