Strange and Whimsical Performances: William Smellie, Alexander Gillies, and the Paratexts to A Treatise of Modern Faulconry

James Campbell’s A Treatise of Modern Faulconry appeared in 1773, accompanied by an anonymous Preface and a long, anonymous Introduction. The Preface ignores the Treatise and offers a burlesque of the first volume of Lord Monboddo’s The Origin and Progress of Language ; the Introduction offers fantastic tales of falconry that scarcely resemble the actual practice. This essay argues that the Preface was written by Alexander Gillies, a Presbyterian minister, and the Introduction by William Smellie, the printer and natural historian. However, authorial attribution is but one portion of the story. It is shown that both men had some antipathy to falconry, that Gillies held deep reasons for challenging the thought of Monboddo, and that Smellie maintained long-standing concerns about the treatment of animals. In this way, these paratexts also enter eighteenth-century debates on the status of the human and the animal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Library
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3828/library.2026.27.3.359
Primary Topic
Literature: history, themes, analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strange and Whimsical Performances: William Smellie, Alexander Gillies, and the Paratexts to A Treatise of Modern Faulconry

Eugene Heath
The Library
Literature: history, themes, analysis
article

Strange and Whimsical Performances: William Smellie, Alexander Gillies, and the Paratexts to A Treatise of Modern Faulconry

Eugene Heath
article en

Abstract

James Campbell’s A Treatise of Modern Faulconry appeared in 1773, accompanied by an anonymous Preface and a long, anonymous Introduction. The Preface ignores the Treatise and offers a burlesque of the first volume of Lord Monboddo’s The Origin and Progress of Language ; the Introduction offers fantastic tales of falconry that scarcely resemble the actual practice. This essay argues that the Preface was written by Alexander Gillies, a Presbyterian minister, and the Introduction by William Smellie, the printer and natural historian. However, authorial attribution is but one portion of the story. It is shown that both men had some antipathy to falconry, that Gillies held deep reasons for challenging the thought of Monboddo, and that Smellie maintained long-standing concerns about the treatment of animals. In this way, these paratexts also enter eighteenth-century debates on the status of the human and the animal.

The LibraryVol. 27(3)
SUNY New Paltz (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Literature: history, themes, analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.