Coadapting but not static predators facilitate prey adaptation to a fluctuating environment

Understanding how between-species interactions influence adaptation and population persistence in the face of environmental change is one of the greatest challenges for modern ecology and evolution, with important implications for conservation, and other applied fields. As predation is ubiquitous and may have strong demographic and selective impacts, it is likely to alter how prey respond to a changing environment. However, whether and how adaptation in prey depends on the way selection operates on predators remains little understood. We investigate this question by modeling the evolution of a prey’s trait whose optimum phenotype for fitness changes with the abiotic environment and which also influences predation via its match with a trait of a predator species. We first show that when coevolutionary processes explicitly emerge from interactions among individuals, maladaptation in prey is not proportional to the difference between the optimum phenotypes for prey and for predators, as assumed in most coevolutionary models. In a fluctuating environment, how well the prey track their moving optimum crucially depends on whether and how their predators evolve. Adaptive tracking of the optimum in prey is facilitated if predators track the same optimum, but hampered if predators have a fixed optimum, or cannot evolve. With eco-evolutionary dynamics, phenotypic mismatch reduces the population size of predators, thus decreasing the strength of predatory selection, but the qualitative influence of predation on prey maladaptation remains otherwise similar. Our findings highlight the importance of the evolutionary context of predators for their impacts on prey and challenge conservation strategies for prey based on removing their predators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2617905123
Primary Topic
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Coadapting but not static predators facilitate prey adaptation to a fluctuating environment

Luis‐Miguel Chevin, Aryan Ramachandran, Lou Guyot
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
article

Coadapting but not static predators facilitate prey adaptation to a fluctuating environment

Luis‐Miguel Chevin, Aryan Ramachandran, Lou Guyot
article en

Abstract

Understanding how between-species interactions influence adaptation and population persistence in the face of environmental change is one of the greatest challenges for modern ecology and evolution, with important implications for conservation, and other applied fields. As predation is ubiquitous and may have strong demographic and selective impacts, it is likely to alter how prey respond to a changing environment. However, whether and how adaptation in prey depends on the way selection operates on predators remains little understood. We investigate this question by modeling the evolution of a prey’s trait whose optimum phenotype for fitness changes with the abiotic environment and which also influences predation via its match with a trait of a predator species. We first show that when coevolutionary processes explicitly emerge from interactions among individuals, maladaptation in prey is not proportional to the difference between the optimum phenotypes for prey and for predators, as assumed in most coevolutionary models. In a fluctuating environment, how well the prey track their moving optimum crucially depends on whether and how their predators evolve. Adaptive tracking of the optimum in prey is facilitated if predators track the same optimum, but hampered if predators have a fixed optimum, or cannot evolve. With eco-evolutionary dynamics, phenotypic mismatch reduces the population size of predators, thus decreasing the strength of predatory selection, but the qualitative influence of predation on prey maladaptation remains otherwise similar. Our findings highlight the importance of the evolutionary context of predators for their impacts on prey and challenge conservation strategies for prey based on removing their predators.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 123(37)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), École Normale Supérieure de Lyon (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), École Pratique des Hautes Études (FR), AgroParisTech (FR), Centre d'Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive (FR), Ecologie, Société, Evolution (FR)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.