Stability of Complete Blood Count Parameters in Rats and Rabbits: Impact of Blood Sampling Volume and Storage Time on Analytical Reliability

BACKGROUND: In laboratory practice, complete blood count (CBC) analysis is not always immediate, and underfilled or overfilled blood tubes may yield misleading results. OBJECTIVES: To assess CBC stability in rats and rabbits over 24 h and determine the effect of under- or over-filled tubes on alterations in the results, demonstrating which indices remain reliable under these conditions. METHODS: vacuum tubes from rats (tubes: 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 mL) and rabbits (tubes: 2.0, 2.5 mL). All tubes were stored at 4°C and analyzed at 0, 4, 8, and 24 h using a CBC analyzer. RESULTS: Statistically significant changes (p < 0.05) were observed: In rats, white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, red blood cell (RBC), hematocrit (HCT), and hemoglobin (Hb) counts were sensitive to blood sampling volume and decreased with smaller volumes. WBC, neutrophil, RBC, HCT, and platelet (PLT) counts showed no statistically significant change within 24 h. In rabbits, blood sampling volume and storage time independently influenced WBC, neutrophil, lymphocyte, and Hb counts. RBC, HCT, and PLT counts showed no statistically significant change within 8 h. CONCLUSIONS: WBC, neutrophil, lymphocyte, RBC, HCT, and Hb are volume-sensitive in rats and rabbits, whereas PLT counts are unaffected by volume. Therefore, blood samples with insufficient or excessive fill may still be used for PLT measurement, but results for the other indices are not recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Veterinary Clinical Pathology
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/vcp.70140
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stability of Complete Blood Count Parameters in Rats and Rabbits: Impact of Blood Sampling Volume and Storage Time on Analytical Reliability

Jian-an Ling, Yanni Huang, Michael Aschner, Yue‐Ming Jiang et al.
Veterinary Clinical Pathology
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

Stability of Complete Blood Count Parameters in Rats and Rabbits: Impact of Blood Sampling Volume and Storage Time on Analytical Reliability

Jian-an Ling, Yanni Huang, Michael Aschner, Yue‐Ming Jiang, Song-wen Fu, Ruize Chen, Yiling Li, Jing Xie, Yu‐Han Xie
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In laboratory practice, complete blood count (CBC) analysis is not always immediate, and underfilled or overfilled blood tubes may yield misleading results. OBJECTIVES: To assess CBC stability in rats and rabbits over 24 h and determine the effect of under- or over-filled tubes on alterations in the results, demonstrating which indices remain reliable under these conditions. METHODS: vacuum tubes from rats (tubes: 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 mL) and rabbits (tubes: 2.0, 2.5 mL). All tubes were stored at 4°C and analyzed at 0, 4, 8, and 24 h using a CBC analyzer. RESULTS: Statistically significant changes (p < 0.05) were observed: In rats, white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, red blood cell (RBC), hematocrit (HCT), and hemoglobin (Hb) counts were sensitive to blood sampling volume and decreased with smaller volumes. WBC, neutrophil, RBC, HCT, and platelet (PLT) counts showed no statistically significant change within 24 h. In rabbits, blood sampling volume and storage time independently influenced WBC, neutrophil, lymphocyte, and Hb counts. RBC, HCT, and PLT counts showed no statistically significant change within 8 h. CONCLUSIONS: WBC, neutrophil, lymphocyte, RBC, HCT, and Hb are volume-sensitive in rats and rabbits, whereas PLT counts are unaffected by volume. Therefore, blood samples with insufficient or excessive fill may still be used for PLT measurement, but results for the other indices are not recommended.

Veterinary Clinical Pathology
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), Guangxi Medical University (CN), Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Health and Family Planning (CN), Guangxi Center for Disease Prevention and Control (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.