Beyond the Binary: Why M1/M2 is Holding Lung Immunology Back

Macrophages are the most abundant immune cell in the lung and play essential roles in tissue development, homeostasis, the initiation of immune responses, and the resolution of injury. Historically, macrophage activation has been defined by the in vitro culture conditions used to generate populations such as M1 or M2, or by the expression of individual transcriptional and cell-surface protein markers. In this Lung Science Brief, we review the historical evolution of macrophage classification and highlight key limitations of conceptual frameworks such as the M1/M2 paradigm for the understanding of lung biology and disease. We argue that comprehensive molecular profiling is a necessary, but not sufficient, starting point for defining lung macrophage subset identities. Meaningful classification schemes for lung monocyte and macrophage subsets should incorporate validation based on functional properties and clinical relevance. We provide examples of approaches to assess lung macrophage function that extend beyond traditional marker-based classification frameworks. Greater emphasis on functional validation may help unify experimental approaches, improve reproducibility, and accelerate translation of macrophage biology into clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ajrcmb/aanag181
Primary Topic
Immune cells in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the Binary: Why M1/M2 is Holding Lung Immunology Back

Kara J. Mould, Megan N. Ballinger, Eric D. Morrell
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
Immune cells in cancer
article

Beyond the Binary: Why M1/M2 is Holding Lung Immunology Back

Kara J. Mould, Megan N. Ballinger, Eric D. Morrell
article en

Abstract

Macrophages are the most abundant immune cell in the lung and play essential roles in tissue development, homeostasis, the initiation of immune responses, and the resolution of injury. Historically, macrophage activation has been defined by the in vitro culture conditions used to generate populations such as M1 or M2, or by the expression of individual transcriptional and cell-surface protein markers. In this Lung Science Brief, we review the historical evolution of macrophage classification and highlight key limitations of conceptual frameworks such as the M1/M2 paradigm for the understanding of lung biology and disease. We argue that comprehensive molecular profiling is a necessary, but not sufficient, starting point for defining lung macrophage subset identities. Meaningful classification schemes for lung monocyte and macrophage subsets should incorporate validation based on functional properties and clinical relevance. We provide examples of approaches to assess lung macrophage function that extend beyond traditional marker-based classification frameworks. Greater emphasis on functional validation may help unify experimental approaches, improve reproducibility, and accelerate translation of macrophage biology into clinical practice.

American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
University of Washington (US), National Jewish Health (US), VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US), The Ohio State University (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Immune cells in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.