Caring for the whole: the five R’s of working with complexity in older age

Purpose This study aims to develop a practice-oriented conceptual framework for working with complexity in the care of older people with multiple, interacting needs. This study responds to the limitations of single-condition, standardised models of care by treating complexity not as a deficiency to be eliminated but as a defining, workable feature of later life. Design/methodology/approach This paper is a conceptual contribution developed through an integrative review, a method designed to combine diverse theoretical and empirical literature to generate new conceptual understanding. Five bodies of scholarship – multimorbidity and frailty, complexity science, person- and relationship-centred care, the ethics of care and inequalities and intersectionality – were purposively identified and thematically synthesised to surface recurring principles of effective practice. Findings Complexity in later life is emergent and relational: the combined effect of physical, cognitive, mental and social factors is frequently greater than the sum of the parts, as the paradigmatic case of deafblindness demonstrates. Five interdependent principles recur across otherwise disparate literature. This study consolidates them into the “Five R’s” of complexity-informed care: Recognise, Relate, Reconfigure, Respond and Redistribute. Practical implications The framework offers practitioners, managers and commissioners a shared vocabulary and a set of orienting questions for holistic assessment, care coordination, adaptive practice and equitable service design. It foregrounds relational continuity, boundary-spanning coordination, tolerance of uncertainty and explicit attention to inequality and the agency of older people and their carers. Originality/value This study connects complexity theory with relationship-centred and equity-focused traditions of care that are seldom held in a single view, translating abstract concepts into a usable, teachable framework with explicit implications for everyday practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Working with Older People
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/wwop-07-2026-0079
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Caring for the whole: the five R’s of working with complexity in older age

Linto Thomas, Milan Bishnoi, Ruchi Kumari Sharma
Working with Older People
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

Caring for the whole: the five R’s of working with complexity in older age

Linto Thomas, Milan Bishnoi, Ruchi Kumari Sharma
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to develop a practice-oriented conceptual framework for working with complexity in the care of older people with multiple, interacting needs. This study responds to the limitations of single-condition, standardised models of care by treating complexity not as a deficiency to be eliminated but as a defining, workable feature of later life. Design/methodology/approach This paper is a conceptual contribution developed through an integrative review, a method designed to combine diverse theoretical and empirical literature to generate new conceptual understanding. Five bodies of scholarship – multimorbidity and frailty, complexity science, person- and relationship-centred care, the ethics of care and inequalities and intersectionality – were purposively identified and thematically synthesised to surface recurring principles of effective practice. Findings Complexity in later life is emergent and relational: the combined effect of physical, cognitive, mental and social factors is frequently greater than the sum of the parts, as the paradigmatic case of deafblindness demonstrates. Five interdependent principles recur across otherwise disparate literature. This study consolidates them into the “Five R’s” of complexity-informed care: Recognise, Relate, Reconfigure, Respond and Redistribute. Practical implications The framework offers practitioners, managers and commissioners a shared vocabulary and a set of orienting questions for holistic assessment, care coordination, adaptive practice and equitable service design. It foregrounds relational continuity, boundary-spanning coordination, tolerance of uncertainty and explicit attention to inequality and the agency of older people and their carers. Originality/value This study connects complexity theory with relationship-centred and equity-focused traditions of care that are seldom held in a single view, translating abstract concepts into a usable, teachable framework with explicit implications for everyday practice.

Working with Older People
Christ University (IN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.