Development and external validation of an interpretable machine learning model for high-frequency hearing loss screening

Early identification of high-frequency hearing loss (HFHL) remains difficult in community settings because conventional audiometric screening requires specialized equipment and trained personnel. We aimed to develop, interpret, and externally validate a machine-learning model using routinely collected information to support HFHL risk screening in Chinese adults. Data from 13,950 adults participating in the 2023–2025 China National Health Survey were randomly divided into training and internal validation sets (8:2). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used for feature selection, and eight machine-learning algorithms were compared. Discrimination, classification performance, and probabilistic accuracy were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, specificity, and Brier score. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used for interpretation. Two sensitivity analyses assessed model performance for isolated HFHL and HFHL concurrent with speech-frequency hearing loss. External validation was performed in an independent hospital-based cohort of 223 adults. HFHL was present in 9,779 of 13,950 participants (70.10%). LASSO retained 11 predictors, with age having the largest coefficient. XGBoost showed the highest AUC (0.8728; 95% CI, 0.8589–0.8860) and the lowest Brier score (0.1276) among the eight models. In sensitivity analyses, the AUC was 0.7869 for isolated HFHL versus normal hearing and 0.9063 for concurrent HFHL and speech-frequency hearing loss versus normal hearing. SHAP analysis identified age, menopausal status, sex, and educational level as the leading contributors. In external validation, XGBoost achieved an AUC of 0.9196, a Brier score of 0.1126, an accuracy of 86.55%, a sensitivity of 81.52%, and a specificity of 90.08%. An interpretable XGBoost model based on routinely available variables showed good discrimination and probabilistic accuracy for HFHL screening, including in an independent hospital cohort. The accompanying web tool may support preliminary risk stratification and referral for formal audiometry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-29239-3
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and external validation of an interpretable machine learning model for high-frequency hearing loss screening

Yaoda Hu, Huijing He, Xingming Chen, Yue Fan et al.
BMC Public Health
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Development and external validation of an interpretable machine learning model for high-frequency hearing loss screening

Yaoda Hu, Huijing He, Xingming Chen, Yue Fan, Xin Xia, Guangliang Shan, Shuwen Guan, Fangxu Yan, Chunhao Li
article en

Abstract

Early identification of high-frequency hearing loss (HFHL) remains difficult in community settings because conventional audiometric screening requires specialized equipment and trained personnel. We aimed to develop, interpret, and externally validate a machine-learning model using routinely collected information to support HFHL risk screening in Chinese adults. Data from 13,950 adults participating in the 2023–2025 China National Health Survey were randomly divided into training and internal validation sets (8:2). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used for feature selection, and eight machine-learning algorithms were compared. Discrimination, classification performance, and probabilistic accuracy were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, specificity, and Brier score. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used for interpretation. Two sensitivity analyses assessed model performance for isolated HFHL and HFHL concurrent with speech-frequency hearing loss. External validation was performed in an independent hospital-based cohort of 223 adults. HFHL was present in 9,779 of 13,950 participants (70.10%). LASSO retained 11 predictors, with age having the largest coefficient. XGBoost showed the highest AUC (0.8728; 95% CI, 0.8589–0.8860) and the lowest Brier score (0.1276) among the eight models. In sensitivity analyses, the AUC was 0.7869 for isolated HFHL versus normal hearing and 0.9063 for concurrent HFHL and speech-frequency hearing loss versus normal hearing. SHAP analysis identified age, menopausal status, sex, and educational level as the leading contributors. In external validation, XGBoost achieved an AUC of 0.9196, a Brier score of 0.1126, an accuracy of 86.55%, a sensitivity of 81.52%, and a specificity of 90.08%. An interpretable XGBoost model based on routinely available variables showed good discrimination and probabilistic accuracy for HFHL screening, including in an independent hospital cohort. The accompanying web tool may support preliminary risk stratification and referral for formal audiometry.

BMC Public Health
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.