Agreement and precision of an AI-based measurement tool during robotic-assisted sleeve gastrectomy

Abstract Background Size and shape of the stomach following a sleeve gastrectomy (SG) appear to impact operative outcomes; however, standardization of these variables is difficult without accurate measurements. Manual measurement techniques are prone to inter-operator variability and can be cumbersome. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based measurement tools integrated in robotic platforms may provide real-time, precise anatomical assessment. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the preliminary agreement of an AI-based measurement tool relative to conventional ruler measurement during robotic-assisted sleeve gastrectomy (SG) surgery, the most common type of bariatric surgery performed worldwide. Methods Adult patients ( n = 12, > 18 years) undergoing robotic-assisted SG between August 2025 and January 2026 were included. Measurements (cm) at the widest point of the gastroesophageal (GE) junction and the narrowest point at the incisura were obtained using both point-to-point (P2P) and contour approaches. Data were summarized using mean ± standard deviation (SD). Agreement was assessed using Pearson’s correlation analysis with 95% confidence intervals, partial correlation adjusting for BMI, and Bland–Altman analysis. Results All 12 patients were female with a mean BMI of 46.3 ± 6.5 kg/m 2 . Pearson correlation coefficients between AI and ruler measurements ranged from 0.79 to 0.90 across all measurement types. P2P measurements at the GE junction demonstrated the strongest correlation ( ρ = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.66–0.97), while contour measurements at the incisura showed the lowest ( ρ = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.39–0.94). Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated low bias across all measurements (absolute mean differences < 0.1 cm) with no evidence of proportional bias. Partial correlation analysis adjusting for BMI showed consistent results. Conclusion This pilot study demonstrates preliminary agreement between commercially available robotic-integrated AI measurement tool and standard ruler measurement during live SG, particularly for P2P measurements. These hypothesis-generating findings support the potential of AI-assisted measurement to enhance surgical precision and efficiency, providing a foundation for future larger-scale, multicenter validation studies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical Endoscopy
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-026-13318-y
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Agreement and precision of an AI-based measurement tool during robotic-assisted sleeve gastrectomy

Michael W. Cook, Vance L. Albaugh, Philip R. Schauer, Hector Garcia Navas et al.
Surgical Endoscopy
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

Agreement and precision of an AI-based measurement tool during robotic-assisted sleeve gastrectomy

Michael W. Cook, Vance L. Albaugh, Philip R. Schauer, Hector Garcia Navas, Carlos Galvani, Denise M. Danos, Nicholas Dahlgren, Shubham Bhatia
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Size and shape of the stomach following a sleeve gastrectomy (SG) appear to impact operative outcomes; however, standardization of these variables is difficult without accurate measurements. Manual measurement techniques are prone to inter-operator variability and can be cumbersome. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based measurement tools integrated in robotic platforms may provide real-time, precise anatomical assessment. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the preliminary agreement of an AI-based measurement tool relative to conventional ruler measurement during robotic-assisted sleeve gastrectomy (SG) surgery, the most common type of bariatric surgery performed worldwide. Methods Adult patients ( n = 12, > 18 years) undergoing robotic-assisted SG between August 2025 and January 2026 were included. Measurements (cm) at the widest point of the gastroesophageal (GE) junction and the narrowest point at the incisura were obtained using both point-to-point (P2P) and contour approaches. Data were summarized using mean ± standard deviation (SD). Agreement was assessed using Pearson’s correlation analysis with 95% confidence intervals, partial correlation adjusting for BMI, and Bland–Altman analysis. Results All 12 patients were female with a mean BMI of 46.3 ± 6.5 kg/m 2 . Pearson correlation coefficients between AI and ruler measurements ranged from 0.79 to 0.90 across all measurement types. P2P measurements at the GE junction demonstrated the strongest correlation ( ρ = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.66–0.97), while contour measurements at the incisura showed the lowest ( ρ = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.39–0.94). Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated low bias across all measurements (absolute mean differences < 0.1 cm) with no evidence of proportional bias. Partial correlation analysis adjusting for BMI showed consistent results. Conclusion This pilot study demonstrates preliminary agreement between commercially available robotic-integrated AI measurement tool and standard ruler measurement during live SG, particularly for P2P measurements. These hypothesis-generating findings support the potential of AI-assisted measurement to enhance surgical precision and efficiency, providing a foundation for future larger-scale, multicenter validation studies.

Surgical Endoscopy
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.