The Worth of Human Life: A Multidimensional Foundation for Human Rights

Abstract This article develops a multidimensional account of the worth of human life and explores its implications for the philosophical foundations of human rights. It argues that traditional monistic accounts, whether theological, rationalist, autonomy-based, sentientist, or capability-oriented, capture important aspects of human value but remain limited when treated as exclusive foundations. In response, the article proposes a five-dimensional architecture of human worth composed of (i) biological vitality, (ii) sentient-affective life, (iii) moral capacity, (iv) cognitive-productive power, and (v) relational embeddedness. This structure is understood as interdependent and shared rather than as a set of capacities whose exercise determines moral status. The model explains equal human worth by grounding value in structural participation in the architecture of human life, rather than in the possession or performance of any single faculty. It also clarifies how human rights protect the biological, experiential, moral, cognitive, and relational dimensions of human existence. The article’s contribution is therefore not to replace existing human rights theories, but to offer a more integrative account of the human worth that such theories often presuppose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Rights Review
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-026-00768-z
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Worth of Human Life: A Multidimensional Foundation for Human Rights

H. Melisa Acar
Human Rights Review
Political Philosophy and Ethics
article

The Worth of Human Life: A Multidimensional Foundation for Human Rights

H. Melisa Acar
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article develops a multidimensional account of the worth of human life and explores its implications for the philosophical foundations of human rights. It argues that traditional monistic accounts, whether theological, rationalist, autonomy-based, sentientist, or capability-oriented, capture important aspects of human value but remain limited when treated as exclusive foundations. In response, the article proposes a five-dimensional architecture of human worth composed of (i) biological vitality, (ii) sentient-affective life, (iii) moral capacity, (iv) cognitive-productive power, and (v) relational embeddedness. This structure is understood as interdependent and shared rather than as a set of capacities whose exercise determines moral status. The model explains equal human worth by grounding value in structural participation in the architecture of human life, rather than in the possession or performance of any single faculty. It also clarifies how human rights protect the biological, experiential, moral, cognitive, and relational dimensions of human existence. The article’s contribution is therefore not to replace existing human rights theories, but to offer a more integrative account of the human worth that such theories often presuppose.

Human Rights Review
Harvard University Press (US), University of Glasgow (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.