Differential FGFR1 copy number status displays unique tumour immune microenvironment in triple‐negative breast cancer

Abstract Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 ( FGFR1 ) amplification, a significant cancer alteration with both prognostic and therapeutic relevance, lacks a standardized definition. The relationship between FGFR1 copy number (CN) variations and tumour microenvironment (TME) characteristics also remains poorly understood. This study defined FGFR1 amplification and investigated TME features across FGFR1 CN subtypes in triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) to guide precise treatment. We analysed 182 TNBC tumour specimens. FGFR1 CN status was assessed using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on 88 samples to explore biological differences. Immunohistochemical (IHC) results for CD3, CD4, and CD8 along with clinical data were analysed. Samples were categorized into four groups based on the FGFR1/ CEN8 ratio and the mean FGFR1 signals per cell. Groups 1 (ratio ≥ 2.0, signals ≥ 4.0) and 2 (ratio ≥ 2.0, signals < 4.0) exhibited robust tumour proliferation, increased FGFR signalling, and an immunosuppressive TME. Conversely, group 4 (ratio < 2.0, signals < 4.0) showed significantly enhanced immune cell infiltration (e.g. CD8 + T cells, NK cells), supported by elevated CD3 + /CD8 + T‐cell densities. Group 3 (ratio < 2.0, signals ≥ 4.0) was heterogeneous: tumours with FGFR1 CN ≥ 5 resembled groups 1/2, while those with CN < 5 mirrored group 4. Thus, FGFR1 amplification ( FGFR1 ‐Amp) was defined as FGFR1/ CEN8 ratio ≥ 2.0 or CN ≥ 5.0 (14.29% prevalence, 26/182). Remaining cases were FGFR1 ‐neutral ( FGFR1 ‐Neu). Immune profiling revealed that FGFR1 ‐Amp & HER2‐low TNBC had reduced immune cell infiltration but heightened oncogenic signalling (including epithelial–mesenchymal transition, angiogenesis) compared with other subgroups. In contrast, FGFR1 ‐Neu tumours, especially HER2‐zero, displayed increased immune cell infiltration (NK cells, effector cells), MHC I/II molecules, activation markers, and elevated immune checkpoint expression (e.g. PD‐L1 , CTLA4 , LAG3 ). This study defines FGFR1 amplification in TNBC and characterizes its TME. FGFR1 ‐Amp in HER2‐low TNBC correlates with an immunosuppressive environment, potentially hindering HER2‐ADC efficacy and suggesting combined FGFR inhibition. Conversely, FGFR1 ‐Neu & HER2‐zero tumours with immune activation may respond better to immunotherapy. © 2026 The Author(s). The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Pathology
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/path.70121
Primary Topic
Fibroblast Growth Factor Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differential FGFR1 copy number status displays unique tumour immune microenvironment in triple‐negative breast cancer

Shafei Wu, Zhiyong Liang, Yike Gao, Junyi Pang et al.
The Journal of Pathology
Fibroblast Growth Factor Research
article

Differential FGFR1 copy number status displays unique tumour immune microenvironment in triple‐negative breast cancer

Shafei Wu, Zhiyong Liang, Yike Gao, Junyi Pang, Tianlin Sun, Fei Yao, Changbin Zhu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 ( FGFR1 ) amplification, a significant cancer alteration with both prognostic and therapeutic relevance, lacks a standardized definition. The relationship between FGFR1 copy number (CN) variations and tumour microenvironment (TME) characteristics also remains poorly understood. This study defined FGFR1 amplification and investigated TME features across FGFR1 CN subtypes in triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) to guide precise treatment. We analysed 182 TNBC tumour specimens. FGFR1 CN status was assessed using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on 88 samples to explore biological differences. Immunohistochemical (IHC) results for CD3, CD4, and CD8 along with clinical data were analysed. Samples were categorized into four groups based on the FGFR1/ CEN8 ratio and the mean FGFR1 signals per cell. Groups 1 (ratio ≥ 2.0, signals ≥ 4.0) and 2 (ratio ≥ 2.0, signals < 4.0) exhibited robust tumour proliferation, increased FGFR signalling, and an immunosuppressive TME. Conversely, group 4 (ratio < 2.0, signals < 4.0) showed significantly enhanced immune cell infiltration (e.g. CD8 + T cells, NK cells), supported by elevated CD3 + /CD8 + T‐cell densities. Group 3 (ratio < 2.0, signals ≥ 4.0) was heterogeneous: tumours with FGFR1 CN ≥ 5 resembled groups 1/2, while those with CN < 5 mirrored group 4. Thus, FGFR1 amplification ( FGFR1 ‐Amp) was defined as FGFR1/ CEN8 ratio ≥ 2.0 or CN ≥ 5.0 (14.29% prevalence, 26/182). Remaining cases were FGFR1 ‐neutral ( FGFR1 ‐Neu). Immune profiling revealed that FGFR1 ‐Amp & HER2‐low TNBC had reduced immune cell infiltration but heightened oncogenic signalling (including epithelial–mesenchymal transition, angiogenesis) compared with other subgroups. In contrast, FGFR1 ‐Neu tumours, especially HER2‐zero, displayed increased immune cell infiltration (NK cells, effector cells), MHC I/II molecules, activation markers, and elevated immune checkpoint expression (e.g. PD‐L1 , CTLA4 , LAG3 ). This study defines FGFR1 amplification in TNBC and characterizes its TME. FGFR1 ‐Amp in HER2‐low TNBC correlates with an immunosuppressive environment, potentially hindering HER2‐ADC efficacy and suggesting combined FGFR inhibition. Conversely, FGFR1 ‐Neu & HER2‐zero tumours with immune activation may respond better to immunotherapy. © 2026 The Author(s). The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

The Journal of Pathology
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN), Dian Diagnostics (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Fibroblast Growth Factor Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.