Foundational But Also “Beyond the Scope”? Planners’ Reflections on Land Use Planning as a Space for Indigenous-Settler Reconciliation in Two Canadian Cities

While planning practice in settler-colonial contexts has long reproduced the settler-colonial relationship, growing municipal attention to colonial inequities provides a potential space for transformation. Drawing on semi-structured interviews, this paper interrogates how municipal planners involved in comprehensive land use planning processes in Montréal and Vancouver represent “reconciliatory” practice. The analysis reveals a tension in how planners represent their reconciliation responsibilities toward the transformation of settler planning practices versus in ways that justify their continuity. In doing so, it positions planners’ motivations to proactively disrupt colonial land use planning dynamics as a central component of a more expansive space for reconciliation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Planning Theory & Practice
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2026.2720652
Primary Topic
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Foundational But Also “Beyond the Scope”? Planners’ Reflections on Land Use Planning as a Space for Indigenous-Settler Reconciliation in Two Canadian Cities

Margaret Ellis‐Young
Planning Theory & Practice
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
article

Foundational But Also “Beyond the Scope”? Planners’ Reflections on Land Use Planning as a Space for Indigenous-Settler Reconciliation in Two Canadian Cities

Margaret Ellis‐Young
article en

Abstract

While planning practice in settler-colonial contexts has long reproduced the settler-colonial relationship, growing municipal attention to colonial inequities provides a potential space for transformation. Drawing on semi-structured interviews, this paper interrogates how municipal planners involved in comprehensive land use planning processes in Montréal and Vancouver represent “reconciliatory” practice. The analysis reveals a tension in how planners represent their reconciliation responsibilities toward the transformation of settler planning practices versus in ways that justify their continuity. In doing so, it positions planners’ motivations to proactively disrupt colonial land use planning dynamics as a central component of a more expansive space for reconciliation.

Planning Theory & Practice
University of Waterloo (CA), Regional Municipality of Waterloo (CA)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.