Beyond Regular Power Brokers? Exploring Coproduction as a Civil Society Strategy to Reposition Itself and Extend its Power in Planning

The paper explores coproduction as a promising approach for reframing the planner-citizen relationship on more equal terms. A Montréal-based case study shows how coproduction, initiated by a local non-profit organization, enabled civil society to reinforce its position and extend its power and influence in knowledge-building, envisioning, and agenda-setting in planning. The results show that the relationship between planners and civil society in coproduction is more diverse than previous studies have presented, and that the latter’s roles go beyond complementary and supplementary ones. Consequently, the paper contributes to the discussion on coproduction’s limits and potential to renew planning practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Planning Theory & Practice
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2026.2713152
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Beyond Regular Power Brokers? Exploring Coproduction as a Civil Society Strategy to Reposition Itself and Extend its Power in Planning

Ursula Eicker, Veera Turku, Pierre Gauthier
Planning Theory & Practice
Urban Planning and Governance
article

Beyond Regular Power Brokers? Exploring Coproduction as a Civil Society Strategy to Reposition Itself and Extend its Power in Planning

Ursula Eicker, Veera Turku, Pierre Gauthier
article en

Abstract

The paper explores coproduction as a promising approach for reframing the planner-citizen relationship on more equal terms. A Montréal-based case study shows how coproduction, initiated by a local non-profit organization, enabled civil society to reinforce its position and extend its power and influence in knowledge-building, envisioning, and agenda-setting in planning. The results show that the relationship between planners and civil society in coproduction is more diverse than previous studies have presented, and that the latter’s roles go beyond complementary and supplementary ones. Consequently, the paper contributes to the discussion on coproduction’s limits and potential to renew planning practices.

Planning Theory & Practice
Next Generation Technology (United States) (US), Concordia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Urban Planning and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond Regular Power Brokers? Exploring Coproduction as a Civil Society Strategy to Reposition Itself and Extend its Power in Planning — Ursula Eicker, Veera Turku, et al. · Planning Theory & Practice (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS