Social work and preventing and countering violent extremism (P/CVE): A scoping review protocol

In today’s hybrid and digitally connected world, hate and violent extremism persist across social and digital environments worldwide, driven by complex radicalization pathways that emerge among individuals and groups often driven by grievance and complex vulnerability. In addition to their most violent expressions, including hate crimes, extremist and terrorist violence, these phenomena wield severe negative, detrimental, traumatic, and intergenerational impacts. As governments increasingly adopt social care and public health approaches to prevent and counter violent extremism and associated harms, a gap has emerged in understanding how social workers describe their roles, theoretical frameworks, and practice experiences in what has become known as the field of preventing and countering violent extremism (P/CVE). Problematically so, social work research and scholarship regarding P/CVE seems to remain limited conceptually and geographically dispersed, leading to uncertainty and practical challenges for professionals in the field. To date, no scoping review has been conducted to systematically assess, synthesize, and discuss social work research related to P/CVE. Against this backdrop, the objective of this scoping review is to identify the current research landscape, gaps, and future directions regarding social work and P/CVE. It aims to provide a comprehensive overview of elements, findings, and practice-relevant limitations and opportunities on social work and P/CVE and contributes to both the development of a nuanced understanding of an emerging social work practice field while also furthering the knowledge base and theory of P/CVE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0357887
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social work and preventing and countering violent extremism (P/CVE): A scoping review protocol

David Yuzva Clement, Andrew McKenzie
PLoS ONE
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
article

Social work and preventing and countering violent extremism (P/CVE): A scoping review protocol

David Yuzva Clement, Andrew McKenzie
article en

Abstract

In today’s hybrid and digitally connected world, hate and violent extremism persist across social and digital environments worldwide, driven by complex radicalization pathways that emerge among individuals and groups often driven by grievance and complex vulnerability. In addition to their most violent expressions, including hate crimes, extremist and terrorist violence, these phenomena wield severe negative, detrimental, traumatic, and intergenerational impacts. As governments increasingly adopt social care and public health approaches to prevent and counter violent extremism and associated harms, a gap has emerged in understanding how social workers describe their roles, theoretical frameworks, and practice experiences in what has become known as the field of preventing and countering violent extremism (P/CVE). Problematically so, social work research and scholarship regarding P/CVE seems to remain limited conceptually and geographically dispersed, leading to uncertainty and practical challenges for professionals in the field. To date, no scoping review has been conducted to systematically assess, synthesize, and discuss social work research related to P/CVE. Against this backdrop, the objective of this scoping review is to identify the current research landscape, gaps, and future directions regarding social work and P/CVE. It aims to provide a comprehensive overview of elements, findings, and practice-relevant limitations and opportunities on social work and P/CVE and contributes to both the development of a nuanced understanding of an emerging social work practice field while also furthering the knowledge base and theory of P/CVE.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(9)
University of Toronto (CA), Carleton University (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.