Continuing professional development in building information modeling context: key factors for engagement and motivation

Purpose This research examines the human factors that influence construction professionals' engagement and motivation to participate in BIM-based continuing professional development (CPD). As digitalization reshapes architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) practices, understanding participation in CPD is essential for supporting industry-wide competence development. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative multi-method design combined participatory workshops with an open-ended survey. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings Engagement and motivation were shaped by interconnected pedagogical, organizational and individual factors. Collaboration, interdisciplinary interaction and authentic practice-centered learning supported engagement, while flexible and modular delivery formats aligned with professionals' need for autonomy. Diverse digital and BIM-related backgrounds shaped participants' learning needs and preferences for BIM-based CPD, highlighting the importance of flexible and adaptable learning pathways. Originality/value This study extends research on motivation and engagement in CPD into the underexplored context of BIM-based learning in the AEC sector. While broadly consistent with workplace learning literature, the findings suggest that BIM-based CPD is distinguished by the importance of role-specific project relevance, interdisciplinary interaction and learners' diverse digital and BIM-related backgrounds. The study provides empirically grounded insights for designing BIM-based CPD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-02-2026-0086
Primary Topic
BIM and Construction Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Continuing professional development in building information modeling context: key factors for engagement and motivation

Taija Puolitaival, Linda Kestle, Marco Alvise Bragadin, Kalle Kähkönen et al.
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment
BIM and Construction Integration
article

Continuing professional development in building information modeling context: key factors for engagement and motivation

Taija Puolitaival, Linda Kestle, Marco Alvise Bragadin, Kalle Kähkönen, Emlyn Witt
article en

Abstract

Purpose This research examines the human factors that influence construction professionals' engagement and motivation to participate in BIM-based continuing professional development (CPD). As digitalization reshapes architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) practices, understanding participation in CPD is essential for supporting industry-wide competence development. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative multi-method design combined participatory workshops with an open-ended survey. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings Engagement and motivation were shaped by interconnected pedagogical, organizational and individual factors. Collaboration, interdisciplinary interaction and authentic practice-centered learning supported engagement, while flexible and modular delivery formats aligned with professionals' need for autonomy. Diverse digital and BIM-related backgrounds shaped participants' learning needs and preferences for BIM-based CPD, highlighting the importance of flexible and adaptable learning pathways. Originality/value This study extends research on motivation and engagement in CPD into the underexplored context of BIM-based learning in the AEC sector. While broadly consistent with workplace learning literature, the findings suggest that BIM-based CPD is distinguished by the importance of role-specific project relevance, interdisciplinary interaction and learners' diverse digital and BIM-related backgrounds. The study provides empirically grounded insights for designing BIM-based CPD.

Smart and Sustainable Built Environment
Tallinn University of Technology (EE), GNA University (IN), Tampere University (FI), Research Institute for Building Materials (Czechia) (CZ), University of Bologna (IT)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
BIM and Construction Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.