Cultivating moral sensitivity and restraint-free practice in nurses and midwives

Nursing and midwifery students are frequently exposed to physical restraint during clinical training, often presented as necessary for patient safety. However, growing evidence challenges this assumption, highlighting the risks associated with restraint and the limited implementation of effective alternatives in practice. Studies show that alternatives are considered in only a minority of cases, while organisational and educational factors contribute to the persistence and normalisation of restraint. Although professional codes define restraint as an exceptional, last-resort measure, this principle is not consistently reflected in practice or education. Students may experience moral distress and cognitive dissonance when witnessing practices that conflict with core values such as patient autonomy and dignity. At the same time, hierarchical dynamics, obedience to authority, and the influence of the hidden curriculum and professional socialisation may inhibit critical reflection, foster passive compliance, and contribute to the normalisation of ethically problematic care. Despite these implications, nursing and midwifery curricula often provide limited opportunities to explicitly address restraint, its ethical complexity, and the development of moral sensitivity. This discussion paper explores how educational strategies can support students to critically engage with restraint practices encountered during clinical placements and to develop both moral sensitivity and ethical agency. It highlights the importance of cultivating moral sensitivity through reflection, simulation, and experiential and digital learning, enabling students to recognise ethical dilemmas, question routine practices, and advocate for patients. Educational approaches should also promote the application of evidence-based alternatives to restraint, including person-centred interventions such as pain management, environmental adaptations, de-escalation strategies, and the involvement of family members or volunteers. Ultimately, nursing and midwifery education should prepare future professionals to recognise when routine clinical practices have been normalised despite being ethically problematic, to question their legitimacy critically, and to advocate for humane, dignified, restraint-free care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Ethics
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330261476266
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Cultivating moral sensitivity and restraint-free practice in nurses and midwives

L. Bertocchi, Alvisa Palese, Raffaella Dobrina, Gaia Dussi et al.
Nursing Ethics
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
article

Cultivating moral sensitivity and restraint-free practice in nurses and midwives

L. Bertocchi, Alvisa Palese, Raffaella Dobrina, Gaia Dussi, Alessandro Caldarola, Silvana Schreiber, Giulia Galvani
article en

Abstract

Nursing and midwifery students are frequently exposed to physical restraint during clinical training, often presented as necessary for patient safety. However, growing evidence challenges this assumption, highlighting the risks associated with restraint and the limited implementation of effective alternatives in practice. Studies show that alternatives are considered in only a minority of cases, while organisational and educational factors contribute to the persistence and normalisation of restraint. Although professional codes define restraint as an exceptional, last-resort measure, this principle is not consistently reflected in practice or education. Students may experience moral distress and cognitive dissonance when witnessing practices that conflict with core values such as patient autonomy and dignity. At the same time, hierarchical dynamics, obedience to authority, and the influence of the hidden curriculum and professional socialisation may inhibit critical reflection, foster passive compliance, and contribute to the normalisation of ethically problematic care. Despite these implications, nursing and midwifery curricula often provide limited opportunities to explicitly address restraint, its ethical complexity, and the development of moral sensitivity. This discussion paper explores how educational strategies can support students to critically engage with restraint practices encountered during clinical placements and to develop both moral sensitivity and ethical agency. It highlights the importance of cultivating moral sensitivity through reflection, simulation, and experiential and digital learning, enabling students to recognise ethical dilemmas, question routine practices, and advocate for patients. Educational approaches should also promote the application of evidence-based alternatives to restraint, including person-centred interventions such as pain management, environmental adaptations, de-escalation strategies, and the involvement of family members or volunteers. Ultimately, nursing and midwifery education should prepare future professionals to recognise when routine clinical practices have been normalised despite being ethically problematic, to question their legitimacy critically, and to advocate for humane, dignified, restraint-free care.

Nursing Ethics
Boston College (US), University of Udine (IT), University of Trieste (IT), IRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo (IT), Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste (IT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.