Outcomes of immunocompromised and non-immunocompromised patients in the ICU diverge late in the pandemic

Rationale The impact of immunocompromising conditions on outcomes in critically ill patients with COVID-19 remains poorly characterized. We hypothesized that disparities in COVID-19 outcomes in immunocompromised patients may differ by viral strain and time course of the pandemic. Methods We retrospectively reviewed SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive patients admitted to intensive care (ICU) at Stanford from March 2020 to July 2022 using electronic medical records. Immunocompromised status included solid organ transplant; hematologic malignancy/transplant; solid cancer with metastases and recent chemotherapy; HIV/AIDS; and connective tissue disease on immunosuppression. SARS-CoV-2 strain periods were classified as pre-Delta (3/2020–8/2021), Delta (9/2021-12/2021), and Omicron (1/2022–7/2022). We assessed 90-day survival differences between immunocompromised and non-immunocompromised patients by strain using Cox-proportional hazards, adjusted for age, sex, and APACHE II score. Results A total of 791 patients were included, 450 from the pre-Delta period, 114 from the Delta period, and 227 from the Omicron period. We compared 633 non-immunocompromised patients with 158 immunocompromised patients (77 during the pre-Delta, 22 Delta, and 59 Omicron periods). Patients admitted during the Omicron period were more likely to be immunocompromised (26%) compared to pre-Delta (17%) or Delta periods (19%; p = 0.008). Immunocompromise was associated with worse outcomes in the entire cohort after adjustment (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.2–2.3, p < 0.001). However, when stratified by strain period, immunocompromised status was only significantly associated with higher 90-day mortality in patients from the Omicron period (42% vs 17%, HR 2.9, CI% 1.7–5.0, p < 0.001). Differences in mortality between immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients were not statistically different in either the pre-Delta (34% vs. 23%, HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.9–2.1, p = 0.15) or Delta periods (32% vs. 28% HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.4–2.5, p = 0.92). Notably, survival was significantly improved during the Omicron period compared to earlier strain periods in immunocompetent patients (HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4–0.9, p = 0.02) but not for immunocompromised patients (HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.80–2.44, p = 0.24). Conclusion In this retrospective cohort analysis of patients admitted to the ICU due to SARS-CoV-2 infection, we found that lower survival among immunocompromised patients was due to higher mortality during the Omicron period, with similar mortality between immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients during other periods.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0357181
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes of immunocompromised and non-immunocompromised patients in the ICU diverge late in the pandemic

William Collins, Jennifer Wilson, Caitlin M. Parmer, Joseph E. Levitt et al.
PLoS ONE
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
article

Outcomes of immunocompromised and non-immunocompromised patients in the ICU diverge late in the pandemic

William Collins, Jennifer Wilson, Caitlin M. Parmer, Joseph E. Levitt, Christian O’Donnell, Shreya Battu, Andrew R. Moore, Ana Pacheco-Navarro, Angela J. Rogers, Jonasel Roque, Tara Ramaswamy, Pablo Sanchez, Katie Lebold, Shaun Pienkos
article en

Abstract

Rationale The impact of immunocompromising conditions on outcomes in critically ill patients with COVID-19 remains poorly characterized. We hypothesized that disparities in COVID-19 outcomes in immunocompromised patients may differ by viral strain and time course of the pandemic. Methods We retrospectively reviewed SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive patients admitted to intensive care (ICU) at Stanford from March 2020 to July 2022 using electronic medical records. Immunocompromised status included solid organ transplant; hematologic malignancy/transplant; solid cancer with metastases and recent chemotherapy; HIV/AIDS; and connective tissue disease on immunosuppression. SARS-CoV-2 strain periods were classified as pre-Delta (3/2020–8/2021), Delta (9/2021-12/2021), and Omicron (1/2022–7/2022). We assessed 90-day survival differences between immunocompromised and non-immunocompromised patients by strain using Cox-proportional hazards, adjusted for age, sex, and APACHE II score. Results A total of 791 patients were included, 450 from the pre-Delta period, 114 from the Delta period, and 227 from the Omicron period. We compared 633 non-immunocompromised patients with 158 immunocompromised patients (77 during the pre-Delta, 22 Delta, and 59 Omicron periods). Patients admitted during the Omicron period were more likely to be immunocompromised (26%) compared to pre-Delta (17%) or Delta periods (19%; p = 0.008). Immunocompromise was associated with worse outcomes in the entire cohort after adjustment (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.2–2.3, p < 0.001). However, when stratified by strain period, immunocompromised status was only significantly associated with higher 90-day mortality in patients from the Omicron period (42% vs 17%, HR 2.9, CI% 1.7–5.0, p < 0.001). Differences in mortality between immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients were not statistically different in either the pre-Delta (34% vs. 23%, HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.9–2.1, p = 0.15) or Delta periods (32% vs. 28% HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.4–2.5, p = 0.92). Notably, survival was significantly improved during the Omicron period compared to earlier strain periods in immunocompetent patients (HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4–0.9, p = 0.02) but not for immunocompromised patients (HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.80–2.44, p = 0.24). Conclusion In this retrospective cohort analysis of patients admitted to the ICU due to SARS-CoV-2 infection, we found that lower survival among immunocompromised patients was due to higher mortality during the Omicron period, with similar mortality between immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients during other periods.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(9)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.