Adaptive Governance Control for Near-Critical Multi-Agent Systems: State Estimation, Conditional Control and Withdrawal Tests

This paper proposes a governance controller combining admissible measurement, bounded intervention, and independent tests of recovery after support ends. It asks whether intervention exposure changes endogenous recovery capacity and future support demand. Version 3.0 separates assisted stability from autonomous recovery and revises measurement and withdrawal conditions. A matched-budget model experiment compares 1,600 equal-amplitude interventions per arm followed by a common 6,000-step unsupported evaluation. Tapering helps only when the modeled atrophy and mismatch-gated recovery mechanisms are both present. An earlier unequal-exposure comparison is withdrawn as an admissible prediction test. All eleven predictions remain open; deployment effectiveness and general optimality are not established.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22677947
Primary Topic
Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adaptive Governance Control for Near-Critical Multi-Agent Systems: State Estimation, Conditional Control and Withdrawal Tests

Bin Seol
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
article

Adaptive Governance Control for Near-Critical Multi-Agent Systems: State Estimation, Conditional Control and Withdrawal Tests

Bin Seol
article en

Abstract

This paper proposes a governance controller combining admissible measurement, bounded intervention, and independent tests of recovery after support ends. It asks whether intervention exposure changes endogenous recovery capacity and future support demand. Version 3.0 separates assisted stability from autonomous recovery and revises measurement and withdrawal conditions. A matched-budget model experiment compares 1,600 equal-amplitude interventions per arm followed by a common 6,000-step unsupported evaluation. Tapering helps only when the modeled atrophy and mismatch-gated recovery mechanisms are both present. An earlier unequal-exposure comparison is withdrawn as an admissible prediction test. All eleven predictions remain open; deployment effectiveness and general optimality are not established.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.