Holonomy-first native operations geometric quantum framework and entanglement-sensitive multi-particle holonomic gates

Abstract Holonomy-first quantum frameworks treat closed-loop transformations—holonomies—as the primitive operations from which native gates are mined, rather than as derived quantities. We develop this viewpoint in two parts. First, we construct a gauge-invariant commutator-strength matrix $$S(\epsilon )$$ from trace data of short group-commutator words and use it to drive an explicit native-operation promotion protocol. The bracket-norm interpretation of $$S(\epsilon )$$ is asymptotic with a general $$O(\epsilon )$$ remainder; for inversion-symmetric primitive families all odd-order corrections vanish, giving $$O(\epsilon ^2)$$ accuracy, and a counterexample shows the symmetry cannot be dropped. The promotion criteria are operationalized as declared statistical tests—sampling-cost laws for interferometric and readout-floor regimes, a bias-corrected scale-equivalence rule, and multiplicity control—and a deterministic simulation campaign reports decision replication, false-promotion control, inverse-defect detection, and execution cost under finite-shot readout, calibration error, imperfect inverses, and visibility loss. Second, for two-particle preparations of Schmidt rank two, the common-basepoint return-amplitude residue factorizes exactly as $$\Delta P_\theta =C(\theta )H_E(\chi ,\gamma )$$ , with $$C(\theta )$$ the concurrence and $$H_E=\sin ^2(2\gamma )\sin ^4(\chi /2)$$ a calibrated loop factor, determining negativity, entanglement entropy, product fidelity, and geometric entanglement within the family. A two-boson construction realizes the encoded geometric gate $$-\sigma _x$$ on $${\textrm{span}}\{\left| 20\right\rangle ,\left| 02\right\rangle \}$$ ; under the same two-mode, same-dimension projected-scalar condition, no corresponding one-particle holonomic cycle exists unless the one-body Hamiltonian is scalar. The mathematical ingredients are established; the contribution is the invariant-readout protocol, its quantified cost and uncertainty analysis, and precise statements of what can and cannot be inferred without full operator reconstruction.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Quantum Science
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44464-026-00037-5
Primary Topic
Quantum Information and Cryptography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Holonomy-first native operations geometric quantum framework and entanglement-sensitive multi-particle holonomic gates

James Kazadi
Discover Quantum Science
Quantum Information and Cryptography
article

Holonomy-first native operations geometric quantum framework and entanglement-sensitive multi-particle holonomic gates

James Kazadi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Holonomy-first quantum frameworks treat closed-loop transformations—holonomies—as the primitive operations from which native gates are mined, rather than as derived quantities. We develop this viewpoint in two parts. First, we construct a gauge-invariant commutator-strength matrix $$S(\epsilon )$$ from trace data of short group-commutator words and use it to drive an explicit native-operation promotion protocol. The bracket-norm interpretation of $$S(\epsilon )$$ is asymptotic with a general $$O(\epsilon )$$ remainder; for inversion-symmetric primitive families all odd-order corrections vanish, giving $$O(\epsilon ^2)$$ accuracy, and a counterexample shows the symmetry cannot be dropped. The promotion criteria are operationalized as declared statistical tests—sampling-cost laws for interferometric and readout-floor regimes, a bias-corrected scale-equivalence rule, and multiplicity control—and a deterministic simulation campaign reports decision replication, false-promotion control, inverse-defect detection, and execution cost under finite-shot readout, calibration error, imperfect inverses, and visibility loss. Second, for two-particle preparations of Schmidt rank two, the common-basepoint return-amplitude residue factorizes exactly as $$\Delta P_\theta =C(\theta )H_E(\chi ,\gamma )$$ , with $$C(\theta )$$ the concurrence and $$H_E=\sin ^2(2\gamma )\sin ^4(\chi /2)$$ a calibrated loop factor, determining negativity, entanglement entropy, product fidelity, and geometric entanglement within the family. A two-boson construction realizes the encoded geometric gate $$-\sigma _x$$ on $${\textrm{span}}\{\left| 20\right\rangle ,\left| 02\right\rangle \}$$ ; under the same two-mode, same-dimension projected-scalar condition, no corresponding one-particle holonomic cycle exists unless the one-body Hamiltonian is scalar. The mathematical ingredients are established; the contribution is the invariant-readout protocol, its quantified cost and uncertainty analysis, and precise statements of what can and cannot be inferred without full operator reconstruction.

Discover Quantum ScienceVol. 2(1)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Quantum Information and Cryptography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.