Association of Resilience with Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Operative Fixation of Pilon Fractures

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between resilience, as measured by the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), and both clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following operative fixation of pilon fractures. METHODS: Design : Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Single Level I trauma center. Patient selection criteria: Adult patients (≥18 years) with AO/OTA 43 pilon fractures treated operatively between 2022 and 2026 were included. Patients without postoperative PROs or a 6-month BRS were excluded. Patients were stratified by median 6-month BRS into low (<3.67) and high (≥3.67) resilience groups. Outcome measures and comparisons: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System domains (global physical health [GPH], global mental health [GMH], physical function [PF], pain interference [PI], depression, anxiety) and percent of normal function at multiple postoperative timepoints (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years). Clinical outcomes included reoperation, fracture-related infection, nonunion, and amputation. Outcomes were compared between resilience groups. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients were included (low resilience: n = 48; high resilience: n = 57). Low- and high-resilience groups were similar in age (46.7 [range, 20.0-76.9] vs 51.6 years [range: 18.5-88.7], respectively), BMI (29.6 vs 30.7 kg/m 2 , respectively), sex (52.1% vs 42.1% male respectively), and race (60.4% vs 73.7% White, respectively), although patients in the low-resilience group demonstrated higher ISS (15.8 vs 9.8, p < 0.001). Compared with the low-resilience group, the high-resilience group demonstrated higher GMH at all timepoints (all p ≤ 0.021), while depression and anxiety scores were lower at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months (all p ≤ 0.019). Compared with the low-resilience group, the high-resilience group also demonstrated higher GPH and PF scores and lower PI scores at 3 and 6 months (all p ≤ 0.045), as well as higher percent of normal function at 6 months (51.7% vs 40.5%, p = 0.040). CONCLUSION: Higher resilience was associated with improved PROs following operative fixation of pilon fractures, with differences observed early and persisting over time. Resilience represents an important patient-specific factor associated with recovery and may provide additional context when interpreting postoperative outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000003275
Primary Topic
Bone fractures and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association of Resilience with Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Operative Fixation of Pilon Fractures

Shaheryar Asad, Robin M Litten, Ryan N McIlwain, Clay A. Spitler et al.
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Bone fractures and treatments
article

Association of Resilience with Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Operative Fixation of Pilon Fractures

Shaheryar Asad, Robin M Litten, Ryan N McIlwain, Clay A. Spitler, Michael D. Johnson, Alexis N. Alders, Joey P. Johnson
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between resilience, as measured by the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), and both clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following operative fixation of pilon fractures. METHODS: Design : Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Single Level I trauma center. Patient selection criteria: Adult patients (≥18 years) with AO/OTA 43 pilon fractures treated operatively between 2022 and 2026 were included. Patients without postoperative PROs or a 6-month BRS were excluded. Patients were stratified by median 6-month BRS into low (<3.67) and high (≥3.67) resilience groups. Outcome measures and comparisons: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System domains (global physical health [GPH], global mental health [GMH], physical function [PF], pain interference [PI], depression, anxiety) and percent of normal function at multiple postoperative timepoints (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years). Clinical outcomes included reoperation, fracture-related infection, nonunion, and amputation. Outcomes were compared between resilience groups. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients were included (low resilience: n = 48; high resilience: n = 57). Low- and high-resilience groups were similar in age (46.7 [range, 20.0-76.9] vs 51.6 years [range: 18.5-88.7], respectively), BMI (29.6 vs 30.7 kg/m 2 , respectively), sex (52.1% vs 42.1% male respectively), and race (60.4% vs 73.7% White, respectively), although patients in the low-resilience group demonstrated higher ISS (15.8 vs 9.8, p < 0.001). Compared with the low-resilience group, the high-resilience group demonstrated higher GMH at all timepoints (all p ≤ 0.021), while depression and anxiety scores were lower at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months (all p ≤ 0.019). Compared with the low-resilience group, the high-resilience group also demonstrated higher GPH and PF scores and lower PI scores at 3 and 6 months (all p ≤ 0.045), as well as higher percent of normal function at 6 months (51.7% vs 40.5%, p = 0.040). CONCLUSION: Higher resilience was associated with improved PROs following operative fixation of pilon fractures, with differences observed early and persisting over time. Resilience represents an important patient-specific factor associated with recovery and may provide additional context when interpreting postoperative outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III

Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Bone fractures and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.