Comparative Diagnostic Performance of AFP, PIVKA-II, and the ASAP Score for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Large Tertiary Care Referral Center Study from India

Background: Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and protein induced by vitamin K absence-II (PIVKA-Il) are established biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The ASAP score, incorporating age, sex, AFP, and PIVKA-II, may improve diagnosis, but data from Indian populations are limited. We compared the diagnostic performance of AFP, PIVKA-II, and ASAP in a large tertiary referral cohort from India. Methods: In this single-center cross-sectional study, consecutive adults with chronic liver disease and healthy controls evaluated at AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, from January to December 2025 were included. HCC was diagnosed using standard imaging criteria. AFP and PIVKA-II were measured by a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay, and ASAP was calculated for each participant. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and precision–recall analyses at standard and optimized cut-offs derived from the Youden index and F1-score. Results: Among 1305 participants, 686 were cirrhotic controls, 278 had cirrhotic HCC, 130 were non-cirrhotic controls, and 37 had non-cirrhotic HCC. At standard cut-offs, AFP (20 ng/mL) showed high specificity but low sensitivity, especially for early-stage HCC (93.3% and 29.6%). PIVKA-II (40 mAU/mL) showed high sensitivity but poor specificity (82.7% and 26.4%). ASAP (0.526) provided the best balance, with 69.4% sensitivity and 52.2% specificity in early-stage HCC, 82.0% and 52.2% in cirrhotic HCC, and 81.9% and 55.5% overall. ROC analysis demonstrated superior discrimination for ASAP across cirrhotic, non-cirrhotic, and etiologic subgroups, including metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) HCC. Optimized cut-offs, particularly higher thresholds for PIVKA-II (71.3–98.1 mAU/mL) and ASAP (0.6–0.9), improved the diagnostic balance. Conclusions: The ASAP score modestly outperforms AFP and PIVKA-II, offering better overall diagnostic accuracy for HCC in a MASLD-dominant cohort. Lower cut-offs may improve early detection, but performance in very-early-stage disease remains suboptimal and hence there is limited benefit in surveillance-relevant settings. Higher population-specific cut-offs are required for Indian populations. These findings support the use of these biomarkers as complementary tools alongside imaging for risk stratification rather than standalone screening tests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Livers
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/livers6050094
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Diagnostic Performance of AFP, PIVKA-II, and the ASAP Score for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Large Tertiary Care Referral Center Study from India

Shantan Venishetty, Mithun Sharma, Deepika Gujjarlapudi, Anand Vijay Kulkarni et al.
Livers
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Comparative Diagnostic Performance of AFP, PIVKA-II, and the ASAP Score for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Large Tertiary Care Referral Center Study from India

Shantan Venishetty, Mithun Sharma, Deepika Gujjarlapudi, Anand Vijay Kulkarni, Manasa Alla, Nagaraja Rao Padaki, Sai V. Sarada, D Nageshwar Reddy, Sowmya Iyengar, Sowjanya Chamarthi, Pasham Sathwika, Sameer Kumar Akundi
article en

Abstract

Background: Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and protein induced by vitamin K absence-II (PIVKA-Il) are established biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The ASAP score, incorporating age, sex, AFP, and PIVKA-II, may improve diagnosis, but data from Indian populations are limited. We compared the diagnostic performance of AFP, PIVKA-II, and ASAP in a large tertiary referral cohort from India. Methods: In this single-center cross-sectional study, consecutive adults with chronic liver disease and healthy controls evaluated at AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, from January to December 2025 were included. HCC was diagnosed using standard imaging criteria. AFP and PIVKA-II were measured by a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay, and ASAP was calculated for each participant. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and precision–recall analyses at standard and optimized cut-offs derived from the Youden index and F1-score. Results: Among 1305 participants, 686 were cirrhotic controls, 278 had cirrhotic HCC, 130 were non-cirrhotic controls, and 37 had non-cirrhotic HCC. At standard cut-offs, AFP (20 ng/mL) showed high specificity but low sensitivity, especially for early-stage HCC (93.3% and 29.6%). PIVKA-II (40 mAU/mL) showed high sensitivity but poor specificity (82.7% and 26.4%). ASAP (0.526) provided the best balance, with 69.4% sensitivity and 52.2% specificity in early-stage HCC, 82.0% and 52.2% in cirrhotic HCC, and 81.9% and 55.5% overall. ROC analysis demonstrated superior discrimination for ASAP across cirrhotic, non-cirrhotic, and etiologic subgroups, including metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) HCC. Optimized cut-offs, particularly higher thresholds for PIVKA-II (71.3–98.1 mAU/mL) and ASAP (0.6–0.9), improved the diagnostic balance. Conclusions: The ASAP score modestly outperforms AFP and PIVKA-II, offering better overall diagnostic accuracy for HCC in a MASLD-dominant cohort. Lower cut-offs may improve early detection, but performance in very-early-stage disease remains suboptimal and hence there is limited benefit in surveillance-relevant settings. Higher population-specific cut-offs are required for Indian populations. These findings support the use of these biomarkers as complementary tools alongside imaging for risk stratification rather than standalone screening tests.

LiversVol. 6(5)
CARE Hospitals (IN), Asian Institute of Gastroenterology (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.