A Pilot Study to Develop and Evaluate an In‐Person Group Prenatal Contraceptive Counseling Intervention in the United States

ABSTRACT Context We aimed to develop and pilot a patient‐centered group prenatal contraceptive counseling intervention to assist pregnant people in selecting a postpartum contraceptive method. Methods In this United States‐based mixed‐methods study, we conducted focus group discussions (FGDs) with pregnant and postpartum participants to identify priorities and preferences for contraceptive counseling. We then designed a group prenatal contraceptive counseling intervention and administered the intervention among a group of pregnant individuals, with pre‐ and post‐intervention assessments of changes in contraception knowledge, participant satisfaction, and decisional conflict. Results Twenty‐four FGD participants identified several counseling priorities: hearing others' experiences; addressing contraception while breastfeeding and experiencing menstrual changes and/or weight gain; and seeing and holding contraceptive method models. We incorporated these priorities into the group prenatal contraceptive counseling intervention and tested it among 39 pregnant participants. Compared to pre‐intervention, contraceptive knowledge post‐intervention improved regarding intrauterine devices' relative effectiveness versus oral contraceptive pills ( p = 0.015) and sterilization compared to external condoms ( p = 0.035), as did knowledge of individual contraceptive methods' potential impact on breastfeeding (all p values < 0.0001). Most (87%) reported high satisfaction with the counseling intervention and would recommend it to others. Based on a validated decisional conflict scale, most participants (97–100%) felt they had enough support and knowledge after the intervention to choose a contraceptive method. Conclusions We successfully developed a patient‐centered, group prenatal contraceptive counseling intervention based on people's values and preferences, demonstrating high satisfaction, acceptability, and improved contraceptive knowledge. This intervention, designed to address participants' priorities, can be an innovative approach to prenatal contraception counseling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/psrh.70086
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A Pilot Study to Develop and Evaluate an In‐Person Group Prenatal Contraceptive Counseling Intervention in the United States

Lisbet Lundsberg, Aileen Gariepy, Neena Qasba, Nancy Stanwood
Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

A Pilot Study to Develop and Evaluate an In‐Person Group Prenatal Contraceptive Counseling Intervention in the United States

Lisbet Lundsberg, Aileen Gariepy, Neena Qasba, Nancy Stanwood
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Context We aimed to develop and pilot a patient‐centered group prenatal contraceptive counseling intervention to assist pregnant people in selecting a postpartum contraceptive method. Methods In this United States‐based mixed‐methods study, we conducted focus group discussions (FGDs) with pregnant and postpartum participants to identify priorities and preferences for contraceptive counseling. We then designed a group prenatal contraceptive counseling intervention and administered the intervention among a group of pregnant individuals, with pre‐ and post‐intervention assessments of changes in contraception knowledge, participant satisfaction, and decisional conflict. Results Twenty‐four FGD participants identified several counseling priorities: hearing others' experiences; addressing contraception while breastfeeding and experiencing menstrual changes and/or weight gain; and seeing and holding contraceptive method models. We incorporated these priorities into the group prenatal contraceptive counseling intervention and tested it among 39 pregnant participants. Compared to pre‐intervention, contraceptive knowledge post‐intervention improved regarding intrauterine devices' relative effectiveness versus oral contraceptive pills ( p = 0.015) and sterilization compared to external condoms ( p = 0.035), as did knowledge of individual contraceptive methods' potential impact on breastfeeding (all p values < 0.0001). Most (87%) reported high satisfaction with the counseling intervention and would recommend it to others. Based on a validated decisional conflict scale, most participants (97–100%) felt they had enough support and knowledge after the intervention to choose a contraceptive method. Conclusions We successfully developed a patient‐centered, group prenatal contraceptive counseling intervention based on people's values and preferences, demonstrating high satisfaction, acceptability, and improved contraceptive knowledge. This intervention, designed to address participants' priorities, can be an innovative approach to prenatal contraception counseling.

Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
Yale University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.