Tense Accuracy and Student Emotions in AI ‐Supported Translation Tasks: A Classroom‐Based Investigation

ABSTRACT Background Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is increasingly used in higher‐education language instruction, but classroom evidence combining tense accuracy with task‐related emotions in translation remains limited. Objectives This study examined changes in English tense accuracy from pretest to posttest following ChatGPT‐supported translation tasks and investigated students' enjoyment, curiosity, boredom, and anxiety during the tasks. Methods Thirteen female third‐year English majors completed a seven‐week mixed‐methods study comprising a pretest, four ChatGPT‐supported Polish‐to‐English translation tasks, a posttest, emotion grids, and individual interviews. After each task, participants retrospectively rated the four emotions at the beginning, middle, and end of the activity. Pretest and posttest translations were scored independently by two researchers. Quantitative analyses included a paired‐samples t ‐test and Friedman tests with Bonferroni‐corrected Wilcoxon follow‐ups; interviews were analysed thematically. Results Tense‐accuracy scores increased from pretest ( M = 20.38, SD = 5.99) to posttest ( M = 24.54, SD = 2.44), mean increase = 4.15; t (12) = 2.43, p = 0.032, Cohen's d z = 0.67. Across tasks, only anxiety differed significantly, although no Bonferroni‐corrected pairwise comparison was significant. In Task 1, enjoyment and curiosity exceeded boredom and anxiety; in Task 3, both exceeded boredom, but only enjoyment exceeded anxiety. Participants reported greater metalinguistic awareness, strategic use of ChatGPT for checking and revision, adaptation to time pressure, and concerns about overreliance and contextual mismatches. Conclusions Students achieved higher posttest scores and reported mainly enjoyment and curiosity during the instructional sequence. Because the study involved a small intact class and no control group, the increase cannot be attributed specifically to ChatGPT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcal.70330
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tense Accuracy and Student Emotions in AI ‐Supported Translation Tasks: A Classroom‐Based Investigation

Agnieszka Kałużna, Yongliang Wang, Mariusz Kruk
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Tense Accuracy and Student Emotions in AI ‐Supported Translation Tasks: A Classroom‐Based Investigation

Agnieszka Kałużna, Yongliang Wang, Mariusz Kruk
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is increasingly used in higher‐education language instruction, but classroom evidence combining tense accuracy with task‐related emotions in translation remains limited. Objectives This study examined changes in English tense accuracy from pretest to posttest following ChatGPT‐supported translation tasks and investigated students' enjoyment, curiosity, boredom, and anxiety during the tasks. Methods Thirteen female third‐year English majors completed a seven‐week mixed‐methods study comprising a pretest, four ChatGPT‐supported Polish‐to‐English translation tasks, a posttest, emotion grids, and individual interviews. After each task, participants retrospectively rated the four emotions at the beginning, middle, and end of the activity. Pretest and posttest translations were scored independently by two researchers. Quantitative analyses included a paired‐samples t ‐test and Friedman tests with Bonferroni‐corrected Wilcoxon follow‐ups; interviews were analysed thematically. Results Tense‐accuracy scores increased from pretest ( M = 20.38, SD = 5.99) to posttest ( M = 24.54, SD = 2.44), mean increase = 4.15; t (12) = 2.43, p = 0.032, Cohen's d z = 0.67. Across tasks, only anxiety differed significantly, although no Bonferroni‐corrected pairwise comparison was significant. In Task 1, enjoyment and curiosity exceeded boredom and anxiety; in Task 3, both exceeded boredom, but only enjoyment exceeded anxiety. Participants reported greater metalinguistic awareness, strategic use of ChatGPT for checking and revision, adaptation to time pressure, and concerns about overreliance and contextual mismatches. Conclusions Students achieved higher posttest scores and reported mainly enjoyment and curiosity during the instructional sequence. Because the study involved a small intact class and no control group, the increase cannot be attributed specifically to ChatGPT.

Journal of Computer Assisted LearningVol. 42(5)
North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power (CN), University of Zielona Góra (PL), Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (PL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.