The Importance of Auditing Artificial Intelligence: A Governance, Risk, and Assurance Perspective

Artificial intelligence (AI) has moved from experimental deployment to embedded infrastructure across finance, operations, healthcare, retail, and public administration. As organizations delegate consequential decisions — credit scoring, fraud detection, hiring, medical triage, dynamic pricing, and regulatory reporting — to machine learning models and generative AI systems, the assurance function faces a widening gap between what these systems do and what boards, regulators, and stakeholders can verify. This paper argues that auditing AI is no longer a specialized niche but a core extension of internal audit's mandate to provide independent, objective assurance over governance, risk management, and control. It examines the drivers behind AI audit — financial, regulatory, ethical, and reputational — surveys the emerging standards landscape (IIA's Global Technology Audit Guide series, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, and the EU AI Act), and proposes a practical audit approach spanning governance, data, model, and monitoring layers. The paper concludes that organizations which fail to build AI-specific audit capability expose themselves to undetected model drift, algorithmic bias, regulatory non-compliance, and erosion of stakeholder trust — risks that are financially and reputationally material.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64388/irev10i3-1722848
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Importance of Auditing Artificial Intelligence: A Governance, Risk, and Assurance Perspective

Syed Rizwan Shahid
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The Importance of Auditing Artificial Intelligence: A Governance, Risk, and Assurance Perspective

Syed Rizwan Shahid
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has moved from experimental deployment to embedded infrastructure across finance, operations, healthcare, retail, and public administration. As organizations delegate consequential decisions — credit scoring, fraud detection, hiring, medical triage, dynamic pricing, and regulatory reporting — to machine learning models and generative AI systems, the assurance function faces a widening gap between what these systems do and what boards, regulators, and stakeholders can verify. This paper argues that auditing AI is no longer a specialized niche but a core extension of internal audit's mandate to provide independent, objective assurance over governance, risk management, and control. It examines the drivers behind AI audit — financial, regulatory, ethical, and reputational — surveys the emerging standards landscape (IIA's Global Technology Audit Guide series, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, and the EU AI Act), and proposes a practical audit approach spanning governance, data, model, and monitoring layers. The paper concludes that organizations which fail to build AI-specific audit capability expose themselves to undetected model drift, algorithmic bias, regulatory non-compliance, and erosion of stakeholder trust — risks that are financially and reputationally material.

Iconic Research and Engineering JournalsVol. 10(3)
Systems Control (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.