Development and validation of a prediction model for complications in patients with esophageal foreign bodies: A retrospective cohort study

Esophageal foreign body (EFB) impaction is a common emergency, but not all patients develop serious complications. An easy-to-use risk prediction tool is lacking. We retrospectively analyzed 270 hospitalized patients with EFB. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for complications. Lasso regression with 10-fold cross-validation was performed for variable selection. Internal validation was conducted using bootstrap resampling. Model performance was assessed by ROC analysis, calibration plot, and decision curve analysis (DCA). An optimal cutoff was derived using the Youden index for risk stratification. Complications occurred in 67 patients (24.8%). Independent predictors included sharp foreign body (adjusted OR = 2.85, 95% CI: 1.13–8.15, P = 0.035), atherosclerosis (adjusted OR = 2.57, 95% CI: 1.17–5.74, P = 0.019), and CRP (per 10 mg/L: adjusted OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.05–1.28, P = 0.007). The ROC curve showed an AUC of 0.722 (95% CI: 0.642–0.802, P < 0.001). Bootstrap-corrected AUC was 0.698, and the calibration slope was 0.94, indicating good internal validity. DCA demonstrated positive net benefit across threshold probabilities of 0.10–0.60. Using a predicted probability cutoff of 0.25, the high-risk group had a significantly higher complication rate than the low-risk group (47.8% vs. 17.2%, P < 0.001). Sharp foreign body, atherosclerosis, and elevated CRP independently predict complications in patients with EFB. The proposed prediction model shows moderate to good discriminative ability and can help clinicians perform rapid risk stratification. However, external validation is required before clinical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Gastroenterology
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-026-05333-z
Primary Topic
Foreign Body Medical Cases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Development and validation of a prediction model for complications in patients with esophageal foreign bodies: A retrospective cohort study

Xiuping Wan, Kaini Wu, Yi Li, Huibin Weng et al.
BMC Gastroenterology
Foreign Body Medical Cases
article

Development and validation of a prediction model for complications in patients with esophageal foreign bodies: A retrospective cohort study

Xiuping Wan, Kaini Wu, Yi Li, Huibin Weng, Lijuan Wang, Dajun Chen, Xiaohua Lin, Yuan Liu
article en

Abstract

Esophageal foreign body (EFB) impaction is a common emergency, but not all patients develop serious complications. An easy-to-use risk prediction tool is lacking. We retrospectively analyzed 270 hospitalized patients with EFB. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for complications. Lasso regression with 10-fold cross-validation was performed for variable selection. Internal validation was conducted using bootstrap resampling. Model performance was assessed by ROC analysis, calibration plot, and decision curve analysis (DCA). An optimal cutoff was derived using the Youden index for risk stratification. Complications occurred in 67 patients (24.8%). Independent predictors included sharp foreign body (adjusted OR = 2.85, 95% CI: 1.13–8.15, P = 0.035), atherosclerosis (adjusted OR = 2.57, 95% CI: 1.17–5.74, P = 0.019), and CRP (per 10 mg/L: adjusted OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.05–1.28, P = 0.007). The ROC curve showed an AUC of 0.722 (95% CI: 0.642–0.802, P < 0.001). Bootstrap-corrected AUC was 0.698, and the calibration slope was 0.94, indicating good internal validity. DCA demonstrated positive net benefit across threshold probabilities of 0.10–0.60. Using a predicted probability cutoff of 0.25, the high-risk group had a significantly higher complication rate than the low-risk group (47.8% vs. 17.2%, P < 0.001). Sharp foreign body, atherosclerosis, and elevated CRP independently predict complications in patients with EFB. The proposed prediction model shows moderate to good discriminative ability and can help clinicians perform rapid risk stratification. However, external validation is required before clinical implementation.

BMC Gastroenterology
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN), Quzhou City People's Hospital (CN), Quzhou University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Foreign Body Medical Cases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.