Persistent Failure Modes in Tool Augmented AI Systems: Constraint Use and Trajectory Intervention, Evidence Review and Candidate Monitoring Protocols

This paper reviews recurring failures in tool-augmented AI systems through two analytical axes: retrievable but unused applicable constraints, and intervention outcomes that vary with timing, format, and execution state. Version 2.0 distinguishes harmful from beneficial sensitivity and does not infer task-specific capability from general benchmark performance. The evidence review compares harness, handoff, and communication studies with explicit task, information, resource, and denominator differences. Six monitoring candidates require independent future endpoints and account for unresolved and terminal failures. No new agent experiment is reported. Joint-regime and transfer-compression hypotheses remain unvalidated, and the earlier general claim that interruption is harmful is not retained.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22682136
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Persistent Failure Modes in Tool Augmented AI Systems: Constraint Use and Trajectory Intervention, Evidence Review and Candidate Monitoring Protocols

Bin Seol
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Persistent Failure Modes in Tool Augmented AI Systems: Constraint Use and Trajectory Intervention, Evidence Review and Candidate Monitoring Protocols

Bin Seol
article en

Abstract

This paper reviews recurring failures in tool-augmented AI systems through two analytical axes: retrievable but unused applicable constraints, and intervention outcomes that vary with timing, format, and execution state. Version 2.0 distinguishes harmful from beneficial sensitivity and does not infer task-specific capability from general benchmark performance. The evidence review compares harness, handoff, and communication studies with explicit task, information, resource, and denominator differences. Six monitoring candidates require independent future endpoints and account for unresolved and terminal failures. No new agent experiment is reported. Joint-regime and transfer-compression hypotheses remain unvalidated, and the earlier general claim that interruption is harmful is not retained.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.