Two Separable Aging Domains in Blood DNA Methylation Scores Developed for Cancer Research: Mitotic Replication and Early-Life Systemic Dysregulation

Background/Objectives: DNA methylation (DNAm)-based aging measures are increasingly being used in biological aging, disease vulnerability, and cancer-related risk. However, it remains unclear whether these measures capture a single generalized aging process or separable biological domains relevant to cancer-relevant biological vulnerability. Methods: Using data from the Family and Community Health Study (FACHS), we examine whether blood-based DNAm scores capture two distinct biological domains relevant to cancer susceptibility: a replication/mitotic domain, indexed by CellDRIFT, EpiTOC2, and MiAge, and an early-life systemic dysregulation domain, indexed by DunedinPACE, GrimAgeV2, and PhenoAge. Results: Regression results showed clear domain specificity. CRP, BMI, alcohol methylation, and AHRR/cg05575921 were positively associated with the early-life systemic dysregulation domain but showed weak or null associations with the replication/mitotic domain. Cross-domain tests confirmed significantly stronger associations for the early-life systemic dysregulation domain for CRP, BMI, and alcohol methylation, with a marginal difference for AHRR/cg05575921. In contrast, telomere-related methylation and immune-cell composition showed a different pattern. DNAmTL was inversely associated with both domains and did not differ significantly across domains. Conclusions: These findings suggest that blood-based DNAm aging measures do not reflect a single aging process. Instead, they distinguish at least two cancer-relevant methylation domains: one reflecting replication-driven mitotic aging and hematopoietic cell-turnover biology, and another reflecting early-life systemic dysregulation vulnerability linked to inflammation, metabolic risk, smoking methylation, and alcohol-related methylation. This two-domain framework may help clarify how blood DNAm profiles capture complementary biological processes relevant to cancer susceptibility and guide future studies of methylation-based cancer risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genes
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17091083
Primary Topic
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two Separable Aging Domains in Blood DNA Methylation Scores Developed for Cancer Research: Mitotic Replication and Early-Life Systemic Dysregulation

Man‐Kit Lei, Katelyn N. Austin
Genes
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
article

Two Separable Aging Domains in Blood DNA Methylation Scores Developed for Cancer Research: Mitotic Replication and Early-Life Systemic Dysregulation

Man‐Kit Lei, Katelyn N. Austin
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: DNA methylation (DNAm)-based aging measures are increasingly being used in biological aging, disease vulnerability, and cancer-related risk. However, it remains unclear whether these measures capture a single generalized aging process or separable biological domains relevant to cancer-relevant biological vulnerability. Methods: Using data from the Family and Community Health Study (FACHS), we examine whether blood-based DNAm scores capture two distinct biological domains relevant to cancer susceptibility: a replication/mitotic domain, indexed by CellDRIFT, EpiTOC2, and MiAge, and an early-life systemic dysregulation domain, indexed by DunedinPACE, GrimAgeV2, and PhenoAge. Results: Regression results showed clear domain specificity. CRP, BMI, alcohol methylation, and AHRR/cg05575921 were positively associated with the early-life systemic dysregulation domain but showed weak or null associations with the replication/mitotic domain. Cross-domain tests confirmed significantly stronger associations for the early-life systemic dysregulation domain for CRP, BMI, and alcohol methylation, with a marginal difference for AHRR/cg05575921. In contrast, telomere-related methylation and immune-cell composition showed a different pattern. DNAmTL was inversely associated with both domains and did not differ significantly across domains. Conclusions: These findings suggest that blood-based DNAm aging measures do not reflect a single aging process. Instead, they distinguish at least two cancer-relevant methylation domains: one reflecting replication-driven mitotic aging and hematopoietic cell-turnover biology, and another reflecting early-life systemic dysregulation vulnerability linked to inflammation, metabolic risk, smoking methylation, and alcohol-related methylation. This two-domain framework may help clarify how blood DNAm profiles capture complementary biological processes relevant to cancer susceptibility and guide future studies of methylation-based cancer risk.

GenesVol. 17(9)
University of Georgia (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.