Protecting Patient Information in Healthcare

This paper considers the connection between fairness and unfairness from a theoretical standpoint, highlighting the importance of critically evaluating the potential impact of artificial intelligence (AI) tools on patients' perception of healthcare justice. The arguments and analysis are framed within the context of Hannah Arendt's concept of the 'banality of evil' and Miranda Fricker's concept of 'epistemic injustice'. The article suggests that the greatest threat to fairness and transparency when it comes to AI may not be people deliberately trying to cause harm, but rather a widespread culture of apathy and complacency that prevents people from taking action. The paper concludes that renewing patients' commitment to critical thinking and encouraging them to take greater personal responsibility are key. More active and engaged citizenship is also required. By cultivating critical reflection, prioritising data privacy, promoting collective support, building emotional resilience, and advocating for ethical AI, individuals can transform their healthcare into a formidable bulwark against those who seek to curtail their autonomy and stifle their voices. This comprehensive healthcare strategy is about more than just the individual's welfare. It is also about creating a fair, self-governing society in which the potential of each person as a smart, active participant is recognised and protected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioethics
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.70188
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Protecting Patient Information in Healthcare

Marta Szabat
Bioethics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Protecting Patient Information in Healthcare

Marta Szabat
article en

Abstract

This paper considers the connection between fairness and unfairness from a theoretical standpoint, highlighting the importance of critically evaluating the potential impact of artificial intelligence (AI) tools on patients' perception of healthcare justice. The arguments and analysis are framed within the context of Hannah Arendt's concept of the 'banality of evil' and Miranda Fricker's concept of 'epistemic injustice'. The article suggests that the greatest threat to fairness and transparency when it comes to AI may not be people deliberately trying to cause harm, but rather a widespread culture of apathy and complacency that prevents people from taking action. The paper concludes that renewing patients' commitment to critical thinking and encouraging them to take greater personal responsibility are key. More active and engaged citizenship is also required. By cultivating critical reflection, prioritising data privacy, promoting collective support, building emotional resilience, and advocating for ethical AI, individuals can transform their healthcare into a formidable bulwark against those who seek to curtail their autonomy and stifle their voices. This comprehensive healthcare strategy is about more than just the individual's welfare. It is also about creating a fair, self-governing society in which the potential of each person as a smart, active participant is recognised and protected.

Bioethics
Jagiellonian University (PL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.