A hybrid nutrient profiling–processing framework to better inform healthy food choices

Nutrient profiling models such as the Health Star Rating (HSR) are widely used to guide consumer food choices. However, nutrient-based models may not fully account for food processing, potentially overestimating the healthfulness of ultra-processed foods. One suggested solution was considering both nutrient content and processing in food evaluation. This study aimed to test a combination of The Health Star Rating (HSR) with the Brazilian NOVA food classification system using international food composition databases. This study applied a modification to the HSR system by incorporating food processing information based on the NOVA food processing classification. Food products from multiple databases (German Food Code and Nutrient Database (BLS), USDA FoodData Central, McCance and Widdowson’s CoFID, and the Skurikhin database) were categorized by processing level and food group. Baseline HSR scores were compared with modified HSR scores using non-parametric methods. Descriptive statistics and graphical analyses were used to examine score distributions across processing levels and food categories. The study sample comprised 5503 food products and dishes from four databases divided into 13 main food categories. Incorporation of processing-based deductions resulted in systematic reductions in HSR scores for foods classified as more highly processed. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests indicated statistically significant differences ( p ≤ 0.0001) between baseline and modified HSR scores across most categories. Specifically, accounting for NOVA food processing decreased scores in the following food categories: meat and meat products, sauces and spreads, bread and bakery, convenience foods, dairy, cereal and cereal products, and snack foods. Integrating food processing information into nutrient profiling alters HSR score distributions and improves conceptual alignment with processing-based food classifications. These findings suggest that hybrid approaches combining nutrient composition and processing characteristics may enhance the interpretability of front-of-pack labelling systems. Further research is needed to evaluate such approaches against health outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Nutrition
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-026-01479-x
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A hybrid nutrient profiling–processing framework to better inform healthy food choices

Galiya Kaidarova, Almaz Sharman, Madina Razbekova, Akkumis Salkhanova et al.
BMC Nutrition
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

A hybrid nutrient profiling–processing framework to better inform healthy food choices

Galiya Kaidarova, Almaz Sharman, Madina Razbekova, Akkumis Salkhanova, Baurzhan Zhussupov, Arman Duisenbayev, Zhuldyz Uvaniskanova, A.Sh. Sharipbayeva, Vasiliy Khegay, Yuri Sinyavsky
article en

Abstract

Nutrient profiling models such as the Health Star Rating (HSR) are widely used to guide consumer food choices. However, nutrient-based models may not fully account for food processing, potentially overestimating the healthfulness of ultra-processed foods. One suggested solution was considering both nutrient content and processing in food evaluation. This study aimed to test a combination of The Health Star Rating (HSR) with the Brazilian NOVA food classification system using international food composition databases. This study applied a modification to the HSR system by incorporating food processing information based on the NOVA food processing classification. Food products from multiple databases (German Food Code and Nutrient Database (BLS), USDA FoodData Central, McCance and Widdowson’s CoFID, and the Skurikhin database) were categorized by processing level and food group. Baseline HSR scores were compared with modified HSR scores using non-parametric methods. Descriptive statistics and graphical analyses were used to examine score distributions across processing levels and food categories. The study sample comprised 5503 food products and dishes from four databases divided into 13 main food categories. Incorporation of processing-based deductions resulted in systematic reductions in HSR scores for foods classified as more highly processed. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests indicated statistically significant differences ( p ≤ 0.0001) between baseline and modified HSR scores across most categories. Specifically, accounting for NOVA food processing decreased scores in the following food categories: meat and meat products, sauces and spreads, bread and bakery, convenience foods, dairy, cereal and cereal products, and snack foods. Integrating food processing information into nutrient profiling alters HSR score distributions and improves conceptual alignment with processing-based food classifications. These findings suggest that hybrid approaches combining nutrient composition and processing characteristics may enhance the interpretability of front-of-pack labelling systems. Further research is needed to evaluate such approaches against health outcomes.

BMC Nutrition
T.K. Zhurgenov Kazakh National Academy of Arts (KZ)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.