Central Nervous System Symptom Burden and Clinical Implications for Antiemetic Management with Olanzapine in AC Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: Olanzapine 5 mg improves chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) control in patients receiving anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC) chemotherapy, but sedation remains a concern. We evaluated whether central nervous system (CNS) symptom burden identifies patients at higher risk of poor CINV control. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This secondary analysis of the phase III JTOP-B trial included women with breast cancer receiving AC chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to olanzapine 5 mg or placebo plus standard triplet antiemetic therapy. Daily patient-reported sedation and concentration impairment were assessed for 5 days. CNS burden was evaluated using recurrent "Bad Days" (concurrent moderate/severe sedation and concentration impairment) and cumulative CNS burden scores. Associations between CNS symptom patterns and complete response (CR; no emesis and no rescue medication) during 0-120 hours were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 480 patients, CR rates decreased with increasing CNS symptom severity in both groups. In the olanzapine group, CR rates decreased across increasing sedation (75.0% to 51.6%) and concentration impairment (78.1% to 48.6%). Concentration impairment more strongly identified patients with poor CINV control than sedation alone. Higher cumulative CNS burden and recurrent Bad Days were associated with lower CR rates, identifying a clinically vulnerable population. Olanzapine maintained higher CR rates than placebo across CNS symptom strata. CONCLUSIONS: CNS symptom burden was associated with suboptimal CINV control, while 5 mg of olanzapine maintained superior antiemetic efficacy across CNS symptom strata. Monitoring day-to-day CNS symptoms may help identify patients requiring closer observation or additional supportive care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: jRCT1031200134.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Oncologist
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyag351
Primary Topic
Nausea and vomiting management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Central Nervous System Symptom Burden and Clinical Implications for Antiemetic Management with Olanzapine in AC Chemotherapy

Tatsunori Shimoi, Mika Kitahora, Kan Yonemori, Ryosuke Hayami et al.
The Oncologist
Nausea and vomiting management
article

Central Nervous System Symptom Burden and Clinical Implications for Antiemetic Management with Olanzapine in AC Chemotherapy

Tatsunori Shimoi, Mika Kitahora, Kan Yonemori, Ryosuke Hayami, Mitsue Saito, Toshitaka Uomori, Yoshihisa Tokumaru, Hirotoshi Iihara, Michiko Tsuneizumi, Hiroko Bando, Ryoko Udagawa, Naotake Yanagisawa, Manabu Futamura, Ryoichi Matsunuma, Hironobu Hashimoto, Hideaki Ogata, Tomoyuki Fujita, Rie Ozeki, Goro Kutomi, Mototsugu Shimokawa
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Olanzapine 5 mg improves chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) control in patients receiving anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC) chemotherapy, but sedation remains a concern. We evaluated whether central nervous system (CNS) symptom burden identifies patients at higher risk of poor CINV control. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This secondary analysis of the phase III JTOP-B trial included women with breast cancer receiving AC chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to olanzapine 5 mg or placebo plus standard triplet antiemetic therapy. Daily patient-reported sedation and concentration impairment were assessed for 5 days. CNS burden was evaluated using recurrent "Bad Days" (concurrent moderate/severe sedation and concentration impairment) and cumulative CNS burden scores. Associations between CNS symptom patterns and complete response (CR; no emesis and no rescue medication) during 0-120 hours were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 480 patients, CR rates decreased with increasing CNS symptom severity in both groups. In the olanzapine group, CR rates decreased across increasing sedation (75.0% to 51.6%) and concentration impairment (78.1% to 48.6%). Concentration impairment more strongly identified patients with poor CINV control than sedation alone. Higher cumulative CNS burden and recurrent Bad Days were associated with lower CR rates, identifying a clinically vulnerable population. Olanzapine maintained higher CR rates than placebo across CNS symptom strata. CONCLUSIONS: CNS symptom burden was associated with suboptimal CINV control, while 5 mg of olanzapine maintained superior antiemetic efficacy across CNS symptom strata. Monitoring day-to-day CNS symptoms may help identify patients requiring closer observation or additional supportive care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: jRCT1031200134.

The Oncologist
Toho University (JP), University of Tsukuba (JP), Yamaguchi University (JP), Juntendo University (JP), National Cancer Center (US), Toho University Omori Medical Center (JP), Gifu University Hospital (JP), Shizuoka General Hospital (JP), Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital (JP), Juntendo University Hospital (JP)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Nausea and vomiting management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.