Uncertainty-Informed Structural Evaluation of a Halo-Gravity Traction Mobility System

Halo-gravity traction (HGT) is widely used as a preoperative treatment for severe pediatric spinal deformities by gradually applying traction forces through a cranial fixation system. Although the clinical effectiveness of HGT has been extensively documented, uncertainty associated with the structural response and operational behavior of mobile HGT systems has received comparatively little attention. This study presents a preliminary coupled clinical–structural uncertainty quantification framework for engineering evaluation of a mobile halo-gravity traction wheelchair. Reduced-order structural and clinical surrogate models are combined with Latin Hypercube Sampling, bounded beta-distributed input variables, third-order Polynomial Chaos Expansion, and Sobol sensitivity analysis. Sixteen uncertain patient, operational, geometric, fabrication, and halo-interface parameters are propagated through models of combined beam–column loading, elastic buckling, welded-joint loading, scenario-based wheelchair tipping stability, halo-pin load concentration, traction delivery, and representative clinical response. Thirty-two alternative beta-distribution shape cases are examined to assess sensitivity to the assumed marginal distribution shapes. Within the investigated bounds and reduced-order modeling assumptions, the computational screening model did not predict loss of the prescribed structural margins. The results identify the parameters governing the different response modes and demonstrate how uncertainty in mobility-related acceleration, support geometry, traction loading, fabrication efficiency, and halo-pin load transfer can be evaluated within a unified framework. Because the model has not yet been validated through dedicated prototype testing or higher-fidelity full-system simulation, the results should be interpreted as uncertainty-informed engineering screening rather than as experimental verification or clinical certification of device safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13091048
Primary Topic
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Uncertainty-Informed Structural Evaluation of a Halo-Gravity Traction Mobility System

Semih Ölçmen, Jennifer Baggett, Sameer B. Mulani, Easir Arafat Papon et al.
Bioengineering
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
article

Uncertainty-Informed Structural Evaluation of a Halo-Gravity Traction Mobility System

Semih Ölçmen, Jennifer Baggett, Sameer B. Mulani, Easir Arafat Papon, Aylara Ölçmen
article en

Abstract

Halo-gravity traction (HGT) is widely used as a preoperative treatment for severe pediatric spinal deformities by gradually applying traction forces through a cranial fixation system. Although the clinical effectiveness of HGT has been extensively documented, uncertainty associated with the structural response and operational behavior of mobile HGT systems has received comparatively little attention. This study presents a preliminary coupled clinical–structural uncertainty quantification framework for engineering evaluation of a mobile halo-gravity traction wheelchair. Reduced-order structural and clinical surrogate models are combined with Latin Hypercube Sampling, bounded beta-distributed input variables, third-order Polynomial Chaos Expansion, and Sobol sensitivity analysis. Sixteen uncertain patient, operational, geometric, fabrication, and halo-interface parameters are propagated through models of combined beam–column loading, elastic buckling, welded-joint loading, scenario-based wheelchair tipping stability, halo-pin load concentration, traction delivery, and representative clinical response. Thirty-two alternative beta-distribution shape cases are examined to assess sensitivity to the assumed marginal distribution shapes. Within the investigated bounds and reduced-order modeling assumptions, the computational screening model did not predict loss of the prescribed structural margins. The results identify the parameters governing the different response modes and demonstrate how uncertainty in mobility-related acceleration, support geometry, traction loading, fabrication efficiency, and halo-pin load transfer can be evaluated within a unified framework. Because the model has not yet been validated through dedicated prototype testing or higher-fidelity full-system simulation, the results should be interpreted as uncertainty-informed engineering screening rather than as experimental verification or clinical certification of device safety.

BioengineeringVol. 13(9)
University of Alabama (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Steris (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.