Exploring road users’ perceptions of fatbikes and riders’ behaviours in the Netherlands: Implications for public acceptability

Fatbikes, electric fat-tire bicycles, are increasingly visible in the Netherlands. Although fatbikes are classified within the broader electric bicycle (e-bike) category, fatbikes may be perceived as a distinct and riskier mobility mode than conventional e-bikes. As this perception can affect public acceptability, it creates a challenge for their integration into urban mobility systems. Yet empirical evidence on the perceptions and acceptability of fatbikes remains limited. This study examines Dutch road users’ perceptions of fatbike riders and their behaviour, and how these perceptions are associated with the public acceptability of fatbikes, based on an online survey of 508 respondents. Results show that fatbike riders are perceived negatively, often associated with youth and reckless riding behaviour. Compared to regular e-bike riders, fatbike riders are viewed as engaging more frequently in traffic violations and unsafe behaviours. Public acceptability of fatbikes is also considerably lower than that of e-bikes, which are perceived more neutrally. Interestingly, public transport and scooter users are more likely to view fatbikes as an alternative mode of transport. These findings suggest that policy responses need to address the behaviours and concerns that shape acceptability, rather than focus solely on the vehicle category. Policy implications, therefore, include behaviour-focused measures, such as enforcement and education to promote safe riding and prevent illegal modifications, as well as public information campaigns that clarify lawful and safe fatbike use. This study contributes to ongoing discussions on new mobility by providing empirical evidence and policy guidance for safer, more sustainable urban transportation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2026.105246
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring road users’ perceptions of fatbikes and riders’ behaviours in the Netherlands: Implications for public acceptability

Marjan Hagenzieker, Soyeon Kim, Dennis Andreoli
Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

Exploring road users’ perceptions of fatbikes and riders’ behaviours in the Netherlands: Implications for public acceptability

Marjan Hagenzieker, Soyeon Kim, Dennis Andreoli
article en

Abstract

Fatbikes, electric fat-tire bicycles, are increasingly visible in the Netherlands. Although fatbikes are classified within the broader electric bicycle (e-bike) category, fatbikes may be perceived as a distinct and riskier mobility mode than conventional e-bikes. As this perception can affect public acceptability, it creates a challenge for their integration into urban mobility systems. Yet empirical evidence on the perceptions and acceptability of fatbikes remains limited. This study examines Dutch road users’ perceptions of fatbike riders and their behaviour, and how these perceptions are associated with the public acceptability of fatbikes, based on an online survey of 508 respondents. Results show that fatbike riders are perceived negatively, often associated with youth and reckless riding behaviour. Compared to regular e-bike riders, fatbike riders are viewed as engaging more frequently in traffic violations and unsafe behaviours. Public acceptability of fatbikes is also considerably lower than that of e-bikes, which are perceived more neutrally. Interestingly, public transport and scooter users are more likely to view fatbikes as an alternative mode of transport. These findings suggest that policy responses need to address the behaviours and concerns that shape acceptability, rather than focus solely on the vehicle category. Policy implications, therefore, include behaviour-focused measures, such as enforcement and education to promote safe riding and prevent illegal modifications, as well as public information campaigns that clarify lawful and safe fatbike use. This study contributes to ongoing discussions on new mobility by providing empirical evidence and policy guidance for safer, more sustainable urban transportation.

Transportation Research Part A Policy and PracticeVol. 214
Eindhoven University of Technology (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Technische Universiteit Delft
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.