Rebuilding Health and Human Services: A Call to Strategic Planning and Action

Abstract The capacity of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has been substantially reduced since early 2025. This has included staffing cuts on a scale not seen in decades, delays in implementing billions of dollars in grants, and other disruptions to normal operations, all of which have received considerable public coverage and attention. To date, far less public attention has been given to rebuilding efforts. This commentary presents recommendations for rebuilding HHS’ lost capacity, following a series of roundtable discussions convened by a network of former senior HHS appointees. The roundtables included former HHS political appointees, career program staff and division leaders, and health policy researchers from universities, think tanks, and policy organizations. Based on common themes in these discussions, we propose five recommendations to rebuild HHS capacity: (1) treating and funding the rebuilding of federal health and health research capacity as an urgent national security priority; (2) shifting from reactive crisis management to coordinated forward planning; (3) continued documentation of what capacity has been lost and why; (4) establishing an independent, nonpartisan science advisory body across HHS; and (5) write new legislation now so that policy windows are not missed when they open.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Affairs Scholar
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxag245
Primary Topic
Public Health Policies and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rebuilding Health and Human Services: A Call to Strategic Planning and Action

Sean Bruna, Adam Sarvana
Health Affairs Scholar
Public Health Policies and Education
article

Rebuilding Health and Human Services: A Call to Strategic Planning and Action

Sean Bruna, Adam Sarvana
article en

Abstract

Abstract The capacity of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has been substantially reduced since early 2025. This has included staffing cuts on a scale not seen in decades, delays in implementing billions of dollars in grants, and other disruptions to normal operations, all of which have received considerable public coverage and attention. To date, far less public attention has been given to rebuilding efforts. This commentary presents recommendations for rebuilding HHS’ lost capacity, following a series of roundtable discussions convened by a network of former senior HHS appointees. The roundtables included former HHS political appointees, career program staff and division leaders, and health policy researchers from universities, think tanks, and policy organizations. Based on common themes in these discussions, we propose five recommendations to rebuild HHS capacity: (1) treating and funding the rebuilding of federal health and health research capacity as an urgent national security priority; (2) shifting from reactive crisis management to coordinated forward planning; (3) continued documentation of what capacity has been lost and why; (4) establishing an independent, nonpartisan science advisory body across HHS; and (5) write new legislation now so that policy windows are not missed when they open.

Health Affairs Scholar
Medical University of South Carolina (US), Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Public Health Policies and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.