Influence of Astigmatism Magnitude and Axis on the Selection of Non-Toric versus Low-Powered Trifocal Toric Intraocular Lenses in Presbyopic Refractive Lens Exchange.

Purpose: To evaluate the influence of preoperative astigmatism magnitude and axis on the selection between non-toric and low-powered trifocal toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) and their comparative refractive outcomes. Setting: Memira by Bergman Clinics, Norway; HO Londrina – Hospital de Olhos, Brazil. Design: Multicenter, retrospective, interventional cohort study. Methods: Consecutive eyes designated for non-toric (T00) or low-powered toric (T20) trifocal IOLs based exclusively on Barrett Toric Calculator recommendations were analyzed. Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) were utilized to adjust for inter-eye correlation. Outcomes included preoperative corneal astigmatism (magnitude and axis), estimated residual astigmatism, and postoperative manifest astigmatism, evaluated with double-angle and linear distribution plots. Results: The cohort comprised 1,628 eyes (T00: 786; T20: 842). The calculator’s recommendation between T00 and T20 varied continuously based on both preoperative magnitude and axis. Despite the T20 group having significantly higher preoperative corneal astigmatism ( P <0.001), postoperative manifest astigmatism was statistically equivalent between groups (T00: 0.26±0.26 D vs. T20: 0.24±0.26 D; P =0.634). No significant differences were observed in visual acuity, manifest refraction spherical equivalent, safety, or efficacy indices ( P >0.05). However, the T00 group demonstrated higher estimated than achieved postoperative astigmatism (0.33±0.16 D vs. 0.26±0.26 D), whereas the T20 group showed lower estimated than achieved astigmatism (0.10±0.08 D vs. 0.24±0.26 D). Conclusion: The decision between a non-toric versus a low-powered toric IOL relies on an individualized interdependence between magnitude and axis rather than a fixed magnitude-based cutoff. This individualized, calculator-driven approach was associated with comparable postoperative astigmatism between groups, regardless of their baseline differences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000002054
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Influence of Astigmatism Magnitude and Axis on the Selection of Non-Toric versus Low-Powered Trifocal Toric Intraocular Lenses in Presbyopic Refractive Lens Exchange.

Wallace Chamon, Arthur B. van den Berg, Roberta M. van den Berg, Luis F. Brenner et al.
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Influence of Astigmatism Magnitude and Axis on the Selection of Non-Toric versus Low-Powered Trifocal Toric Intraocular Lenses in Presbyopic Refractive Lens Exchange.

Wallace Chamon, Arthur B. van den Berg, Roberta M. van den Berg, Luis F. Brenner, Carolina P B Gracitelli, Karolinne Maia Rocha
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the influence of preoperative astigmatism magnitude and axis on the selection between non-toric and low-powered trifocal toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) and their comparative refractive outcomes. Setting: Memira by Bergman Clinics, Norway; HO Londrina – Hospital de Olhos, Brazil. Design: Multicenter, retrospective, interventional cohort study. Methods: Consecutive eyes designated for non-toric (T00) or low-powered toric (T20) trifocal IOLs based exclusively on Barrett Toric Calculator recommendations were analyzed. Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) were utilized to adjust for inter-eye correlation. Outcomes included preoperative corneal astigmatism (magnitude and axis), estimated residual astigmatism, and postoperative manifest astigmatism, evaluated with double-angle and linear distribution plots. Results: The cohort comprised 1,628 eyes (T00: 786; T20: 842). The calculator’s recommendation between T00 and T20 varied continuously based on both preoperative magnitude and axis. Despite the T20 group having significantly higher preoperative corneal astigmatism ( P <0.001), postoperative manifest astigmatism was statistically equivalent between groups (T00: 0.26±0.26 D vs. T20: 0.24±0.26 D; P =0.634). No significant differences were observed in visual acuity, manifest refraction spherical equivalent, safety, or efficacy indices ( P >0.05). However, the T00 group demonstrated higher estimated than achieved postoperative astigmatism (0.33±0.16 D vs. 0.26±0.26 D), whereas the T20 group showed lower estimated than achieved astigmatism (0.10±0.08 D vs. 0.24±0.26 D). Conclusion: The decision between a non-toric versus a low-powered toric IOL relies on an individualized interdependence between magnitude and axis rather than a fixed magnitude-based cutoff. This individualized, calculator-driven approach was associated with comparable postoperative astigmatism between groups, regardless of their baseline differences.

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Medical University of South Carolina (US), Bergman Clinics (NL), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.