Locating Power in a Cross‐Sectoral Health Promotion Collaboration Addressing HIV and Hepatitis C

ABSTRACT Issue Addressed Power is central to understanding how health promotion networks and collaborations function. Power underpins the relational connectivity, yet its complexity renders it difficult to define. This study explores how power is understood within a health promotion network addressing HIV and Hepatitis C in Victoria, Australia. Methods Inductive interviews were conducted with 30 senior organisational members working in the HIV and Hepatitis C health sector in Victoria, Australia. Participating organisations included community, research, government and health organisations. Interviews were coded in NVivo using an inductive approach, underpinned by a phenomenological framework. Results Five themes were identified: multiple dimensions of funding; collaboration and relationships as power; organisations as champions or gatekeepers; the role of evidence in defining the sector; and the role of advocacy in the sector. The different and recognised power mechanisms, through which each part of the sector could have influence, were a valued characteristic of the response. Conclusion The Victorian HIV and HCV network provides a useful insight into the multiple forms of power within a health promotion network, and how these forms of power helped balance aspects of the power asymmetries in the network. This research indicates the need to consider power in multiple, potentially balancing dimensions when developing policies to strengthen collaborative health promotion practice. So What? Understanding the value of multiple forms of power within long‐term networks may help strengthen cultures, values, and policies that ensure power dynamics enhance, rather than limit, collaborative practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.70247
Primary Topic
Community Health and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Locating Power in a Cross‐Sectoral Health Promotion Collaboration Addressing HIV and Hepatitis C

Peter Higgs, Joseph Doyle, Robyn Keast, Cynthia Webster et al.
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Community Health and Development
article

Locating Power in a Cross‐Sectoral Health Promotion Collaboration Addressing HIV and Hepatitis C

Peter Higgs, Joseph Doyle, Robyn Keast, Cynthia Webster, Daniel Chamberlain, Graham Brown, Maria Kelly
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Issue Addressed Power is central to understanding how health promotion networks and collaborations function. Power underpins the relational connectivity, yet its complexity renders it difficult to define. This study explores how power is understood within a health promotion network addressing HIV and Hepatitis C in Victoria, Australia. Methods Inductive interviews were conducted with 30 senior organisational members working in the HIV and Hepatitis C health sector in Victoria, Australia. Participating organisations included community, research, government and health organisations. Interviews were coded in NVivo using an inductive approach, underpinned by a phenomenological framework. Results Five themes were identified: multiple dimensions of funding; collaboration and relationships as power; organisations as champions or gatekeepers; the role of evidence in defining the sector; and the role of advocacy in the sector. The different and recognised power mechanisms, through which each part of the sector could have influence, were a valued characteristic of the response. Conclusion The Victorian HIV and HCV network provides a useful insight into the multiple forms of power within a health promotion network, and how these forms of power helped balance aspects of the power asymmetries in the network. This research indicates the need to consider power in multiple, potentially balancing dimensions when developing policies to strengthen collaborative health promotion practice. So What? Understanding the value of multiple forms of power within long‐term networks may help strengthen cultures, values, and policies that ensure power dynamics enhance, rather than limit, collaborative practice.

Health Promotion Journal of AustraliaVol. 37(4)
Burnet Institute (AU), La Trobe University (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research centre (AU), Southern Cross University (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Community Health and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.