Rhinology Fellowship Training in the United States: Insights From a National Survey

ABSTRACT Background The proportion of otolaryngology trainees pursuing fellowship has increased alongside rapid expansion in rhinology fellowship programs. Contemporary data evaluating trainee motivations, expectations, and outcomes remain limited. This study assesses contemporary data evaluating trainee motivations, expectations, and outcomes among US rhinology fellows over a 7‐year period. Methods A combined prospective and retrospective survey study was conducted using questionnaires administered to incoming and outgoing fellows at US rhinology fellowship programs from 2018 to 2025. Surveys evaluated motivations, procedural comfort, research expectations, career plans, and overall satisfaction. Responses were analyzed descriptively. Results A total of 241 responses were analyzed (124 incoming, 117 outgoing). The primary motivation for fellowship was to enhance surgical skills and clinical decision‐making, with fewer respondents citing research or mentorship. Fellows reported high comfort with standard endoscopic sinus procedures but lower confidence with advanced skull base and rhinoplasty techniques. Protected research time was inconsistent, with 16%–45% of graduating fellows reporting none, differing from incoming expectations. Interest in a 2‐year fellowship was low (29% incoming vs. 18% outgoing). While 71.8% of incoming fellows anticipated academic careers, 64.1% ultimately entered academic practice. Overall satisfaction was high, with 86.3% reporting that fellowship met expectations. Reported shortcomings included limited skull base exposure, reduced surgical autonomy, inadequate billing/coding training, and insufficient research time. Conclusion Rhinology fellowship trainees primarily pursue subspecialty training to enhance surgical skills and clinical decision‐making. Although training is overwhelmingly perceived as meeting expectations, meaningful gaps persist between anticipated and actual experiences, particularly in protected academic time, exposure to advanced procedures, and non‐clinical skill development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.70274
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rhinology Fellowship Training in the United States: Insights From a National Survey

Tyler Merrill, Tran B. Locke, Nicholas R. Rowan, Hemali P. Shah et al.
International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Rhinology Fellowship Training in the United States: Insights From a National Survey

Tyler Merrill, Tran B. Locke, Nicholas R. Rowan, Hemali P. Shah, Daniel B. Spielman, Carol Yan, Joshua M. Levy, Jacob Rosenstadt
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background The proportion of otolaryngology trainees pursuing fellowship has increased alongside rapid expansion in rhinology fellowship programs. Contemporary data evaluating trainee motivations, expectations, and outcomes remain limited. This study assesses contemporary data evaluating trainee motivations, expectations, and outcomes among US rhinology fellows over a 7‐year period. Methods A combined prospective and retrospective survey study was conducted using questionnaires administered to incoming and outgoing fellows at US rhinology fellowship programs from 2018 to 2025. Surveys evaluated motivations, procedural comfort, research expectations, career plans, and overall satisfaction. Responses were analyzed descriptively. Results A total of 241 responses were analyzed (124 incoming, 117 outgoing). The primary motivation for fellowship was to enhance surgical skills and clinical decision‐making, with fewer respondents citing research or mentorship. Fellows reported high comfort with standard endoscopic sinus procedures but lower confidence with advanced skull base and rhinoplasty techniques. Protected research time was inconsistent, with 16%–45% of graduating fellows reporting none, differing from incoming expectations. Interest in a 2‐year fellowship was low (29% incoming vs. 18% outgoing). While 71.8% of incoming fellows anticipated academic careers, 64.1% ultimately entered academic practice. Overall satisfaction was high, with 86.3% reporting that fellowship met expectations. Reported shortcomings included limited skull base exposure, reduced surgical autonomy, inadequate billing/coding training, and insufficient research time. Conclusion Rhinology fellowship trainees primarily pursue subspecialty training to enhance surgical skills and clinical decision‐making. Although training is overwhelmingly perceived as meeting expectations, meaningful gaps persist between anticipated and actual experiences, particularly in protected academic time, exposure to advanced procedures, and non‐clinical skill development.

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
Johns Hopkins University (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Georgetown University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), UC San Diego Health System (US), MedStar Georgetown University Hospital (US), National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (US), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.