Everyday-Use Resilience in Historic Commercial Buildings: A Review of Spatial Mechanisms, Actor Mediation, and Adaptive Outcomes

Historic commercial buildings are often described as resilient, but the mechanisms that sustain ordinary use remain fragmented across morphology, adaptive reuse, heritage governance, and community research. This Review examines how inherited spatial configurations and actor arrangements jointly shape everyday-use resilience. Using transparent, PRISMA-informed searching, screening, appraisal, and narrative/thematic synthesis, we identified 50 eligible empirical studies from 3314 records. Evidence came from 18 countries or regional settings but remained concentrated in Malaysia (9 studies), Indonesia (8), Türkiye (7), and mainland China (7); no eligible study came from the Americas, and direct African evidence was limited to one Egyptian case. In response to prescreen-sensitivity concerns, all 80 records excluded solely because the deterministic dictionary did not detect a spatial-focus term were independently reassessed; 30 were advanced beyond title/metadata review and 13 ultimately met all eligibility criteria. Four evidence-informed spatial capacities recurred: network permeability, fine-grained and reversible subdivision, climatic and service compatibility, and active public–private interfaces. These capacities did not determine resilience independently. Owners and traders translated capacity into maintenance and incremental adaptation; users sustained social legitimacy; and public, professional, financial, and digital intermediaries enabled or constrained adaptation through regulation, investment, programming, and visibility. Heritage retention was assessed in all 50 studies; use vitality was observed in 40 and assessed prospectively in 10; community benefit was observed or partly assessed in 37, prospectively in 10, and not assessed in 3. The geographically concentrated, English-language, public-API, and full-text corpus limits transferability, while the targeted validation demonstrates why deterministic terminology rules require human sensitivity checks. Everyday-use resilience is therefore presented as an evidence-informed, actor-mediated proposition concerning the conversion of inherited spatial capacity into heritage retention, use vitality, and community benefit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16183581
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Everyday-Use Resilience in Historic Commercial Buildings: A Review of Spatial Mechanisms, Actor Mediation, and Adaptive Outcomes

Weimin Guo, Xunrong Ye, Yi Zhang, Chen Liu et al.
Buildings
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
article

Everyday-Use Resilience in Historic Commercial Buildings: A Review of Spatial Mechanisms, Actor Mediation, and Adaptive Outcomes

Weimin Guo, Xunrong Ye, Yi Zhang, Chen Liu, Ziheng Zhao
article en

Abstract

Historic commercial buildings are often described as resilient, but the mechanisms that sustain ordinary use remain fragmented across morphology, adaptive reuse, heritage governance, and community research. This Review examines how inherited spatial configurations and actor arrangements jointly shape everyday-use resilience. Using transparent, PRISMA-informed searching, screening, appraisal, and narrative/thematic synthesis, we identified 50 eligible empirical studies from 3314 records. Evidence came from 18 countries or regional settings but remained concentrated in Malaysia (9 studies), Indonesia (8), Türkiye (7), and mainland China (7); no eligible study came from the Americas, and direct African evidence was limited to one Egyptian case. In response to prescreen-sensitivity concerns, all 80 records excluded solely because the deterministic dictionary did not detect a spatial-focus term were independently reassessed; 30 were advanced beyond title/metadata review and 13 ultimately met all eligibility criteria. Four evidence-informed spatial capacities recurred: network permeability, fine-grained and reversible subdivision, climatic and service compatibility, and active public–private interfaces. These capacities did not determine resilience independently. Owners and traders translated capacity into maintenance and incremental adaptation; users sustained social legitimacy; and public, professional, financial, and digital intermediaries enabled or constrained adaptation through regulation, investment, programming, and visibility. Heritage retention was assessed in all 50 studies; use vitality was observed in 40 and assessed prospectively in 10; community benefit was observed or partly assessed in 37, prospectively in 10, and not assessed in 3. The geographically concentrated, English-language, public-API, and full-text corpus limits transferability, while the targeted validation demonstrates why deterministic terminology rules require human sensitivity checks. Everyday-use resilience is therefore presented as an evidence-informed, actor-mediated proposition concerning the conversion of inherited spatial capacity into heritage retention, use vitality, and community benefit.

BuildingsVol. 16(18)
Jiangnan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.