Associations between reduction of hypotension and treatment intensity in hypotension prediction index studies

BACKGROUND: The Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI) is developed for proactive prevention of hypotension and existing meta-analyses report reduced hypotension with HPI-guided management in comparison with a strategy based on MAP alerts of 65 mmHg. Still, validation studies suggest that HPI does not outperform simple mean arterial pressure (MAP)-based predictions and report that HPI alerts appear when MAP is ~70-75 mmHg. Existing HPI trials may therefore effectively compare two MAP-treatment thresholds that could be accompanied by different treatment intensity. However, meta-analyses do not consistently report treatment intensity differences. We hypothesized that reductions in hypotension are associated with greater treatment intensity. METHODS: Randomized trials evaluating HPI-guided hypotension prevention were identified from existing systematic reviews and citation tracking. Eligible trials were assessed for (1) statistically significant reduction in the primary hypotension outcome and (2) statistically significant increases in any hemodynamic treatment (fluids, vasopressors, or inotropes) in the HPI intervention group. We examined the association between hypotension reduction and treatment intensity using 2×2 tabulation and Fisher's exact test. Furthermore, for trials reporting time-weighted average (TWA) of MAP< 65 mmHg, we calculated the correlation between the TWA difference and treatment intensity categories (lower, neutral, or increased). RESULTS: Twenty randomized trials (2342 patients) were identified of which 18 reported both hypotension and treatment outcomes. Among 13 trials demonstrating hypotension reduction, 9 (69%) reported significantly greater treatment intensity in the HPI intervention group. In contrast, none of the five trials that failed to reduce hypotension reported increased treatment intensity. Reduction of hypotension was significantly associated with greater treatment intensity (p = 0.029). TWA differences were significantly correlated with treatment intensity (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Across randomized HPI trials, reduced hypotension was frequently accompanied by increased treatment intensity. These associations suggest that successful reduction of hypotension in HPI trials generally occurred together with more intensive hemodynamic treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anesthesiology
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000006367
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Associations between reduction of hypotension and treatment intensity in hypotension prediction index studies

Johannes Enevoldsen, Paul Elbers, Ramakrishna Mukkamala, Simon T. Vistisen et al.
Anesthesiology
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
article

Associations between reduction of hypotension and treatment intensity in hypotension prediction index studies

Johannes Enevoldsen, Paul Elbers, Ramakrishna Mukkamala, Simon T. Vistisen, Martin Ehrenberger Novotny, Matthias Jacquet-Lagreze
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI) is developed for proactive prevention of hypotension and existing meta-analyses report reduced hypotension with HPI-guided management in comparison with a strategy based on MAP alerts of 65 mmHg. Still, validation studies suggest that HPI does not outperform simple mean arterial pressure (MAP)-based predictions and report that HPI alerts appear when MAP is ~70-75 mmHg. Existing HPI trials may therefore effectively compare two MAP-treatment thresholds that could be accompanied by different treatment intensity. However, meta-analyses do not consistently report treatment intensity differences. We hypothesized that reductions in hypotension are associated with greater treatment intensity. METHODS: Randomized trials evaluating HPI-guided hypotension prevention were identified from existing systematic reviews and citation tracking. Eligible trials were assessed for (1) statistically significant reduction in the primary hypotension outcome and (2) statistically significant increases in any hemodynamic treatment (fluids, vasopressors, or inotropes) in the HPI intervention group. We examined the association between hypotension reduction and treatment intensity using 2×2 tabulation and Fisher's exact test. Furthermore, for trials reporting time-weighted average (TWA) of MAP< 65 mmHg, we calculated the correlation between the TWA difference and treatment intensity categories (lower, neutral, or increased). RESULTS: Twenty randomized trials (2342 patients) were identified of which 18 reported both hypotension and treatment outcomes. Among 13 trials demonstrating hypotension reduction, 9 (69%) reported significantly greater treatment intensity in the HPI intervention group. In contrast, none of the five trials that failed to reduce hypotension reported increased treatment intensity. Reduction of hypotension was significantly associated with greater treatment intensity (p = 0.029). TWA differences were significantly correlated with treatment intensity (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Across randomized HPI trials, reduced hypotension was frequently accompanied by increased treatment intensity. These associations suggest that successful reduction of hypotension in HPI trials generally occurred together with more intensive hemodynamic treatment.

Anesthesiology
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Inserm (FR), University of Pittsburgh (US), Aarhus University (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Regional Hospital Horsens (DK), Laboratoire de recherche en cardiovasculaire, métabolisme, diabétologie et nutrition (FR), Hôpital Louis Pradel (FR), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.