Algorithmic auditing of AI credit scoring: integrating IFRS 9 model governance with ethical AI assessment

Purpose This study aims to propose applying the governance principles associated with the implementation of IFRS 9 to the algorithmic audit of artificial intelligence (AI) models used for credit rating. It examines how the principles of validation, documentation, traceability and forward-looking risk assessment used in the implementation of IFRS 9 can be adapted to the audit of AI systems. Design/methodology/approach The framework is validated on the Kaggle Credit Risk data set using four machine learning algorithms. It combines the model governance principles associated with the implementation of IFRS 9 with criteria for evaluating responsible AI. The assessment framework integrates predictive performance metrics alongside fairness evaluation measures, such as Disparate Impact and Demographic Parity. In addition, model interpretability is examined to identify the influence of sensitive attributes. Findings The results indicate that XGBoost achieves the highest predictive performance. However, all models exhibit varying degrees of dependence on sensitive features, particularly age and property ownership status, raising concerns regarding algorithmic bias in credit decision-making. Practical implications The proposed framework can help financial institutions improve the transparency and auditability of AI-based credit scoring systems. It provides auditors and regulators with a structured approach to assessing the performance, fairness and explainability of AI models in accordance with model governance principles. Originality/value This research establishes a link between the governance principles of models associated with the implementation of IFRS 9 and the ethical auditing of AI, two fields that are rarely associated with one another. It contributes to the development of a multidimensional framework that integrates predictive performance, algorithmic fairness and explainability for the auditing of AI-based credit scoring models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Ethics and Systems
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoes-04-2026-0299
Primary Topic
Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithmic auditing of AI credit scoring: integrating IFRS 9 model governance with ethical AI assessment

Azhaar Lajmi, Riham Ben Amor
International Journal of Ethics and Systems
Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
article

Algorithmic auditing of AI credit scoring: integrating IFRS 9 model governance with ethical AI assessment

Azhaar Lajmi, Riham Ben Amor
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to propose applying the governance principles associated with the implementation of IFRS 9 to the algorithmic audit of artificial intelligence (AI) models used for credit rating. It examines how the principles of validation, documentation, traceability and forward-looking risk assessment used in the implementation of IFRS 9 can be adapted to the audit of AI systems. Design/methodology/approach The framework is validated on the Kaggle Credit Risk data set using four machine learning algorithms. It combines the model governance principles associated with the implementation of IFRS 9 with criteria for evaluating responsible AI. The assessment framework integrates predictive performance metrics alongside fairness evaluation measures, such as Disparate Impact and Demographic Parity. In addition, model interpretability is examined to identify the influence of sensitive attributes. Findings The results indicate that XGBoost achieves the highest predictive performance. However, all models exhibit varying degrees of dependence on sensitive features, particularly age and property ownership status, raising concerns regarding algorithmic bias in credit decision-making. Practical implications The proposed framework can help financial institutions improve the transparency and auditability of AI-based credit scoring systems. It provides auditors and regulators with a structured approach to assessing the performance, fairness and explainability of AI models in accordance with model governance principles. Originality/value This research establishes a link between the governance principles of models associated with the implementation of IFRS 9 and the ethical auditing of AI, two fields that are rarely associated with one another. It contributes to the development of a multidimensional framework that integrates predictive performance, algorithmic fairness and explainability for the auditing of AI-based credit scoring models.

International Journal of Ethics and Systems
Higher Institute of Management (RU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.