Advances in Colorectal Anastomoses

Abstract Anastomotic leak (AL) remains a major source of morbidity in colorectal surgery, with leak rates showing little change despite advances in technique and perioperative care. This persistent risk has prompted the development of novel technologies and strategies targeting different aspects of anastomotic construction and healing. This article summarizes current evidence on emerging approaches, including compression and magnetic compression anastomosis (MCA), intraoperative fluorescence angiography (FA), robotic-assisted techniques, and modulation of the intestinal microbiome. These innovations vary substantially in maturity and clinical impact. Among device-based approaches, the nickel–titanium compression anastomosis ring is the most established compression device, with outcomes comparable to conventional stapling. In contrast, MCA remains limited in colorectal practice to a salvage role for recanalization of strictures and atresia rather than an alternative for primary anastomosis. FA has been evaluated extensively, with meta-analyses suggesting a potential reduction in AL rates, particularly for left-sided and low rectal anastomoses, although variability in its interpretation persists. Robotic platforms have facilitated intracorporeal anastomosis and expanded technical capabilities, while the intestinal microbiome has emerged as a modifiable factor influencing anastomotic healing; notably, combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation remains the only intervention with consistent clinical evidence of leak reduction. Together, these advances address complementary components of anastomotic success—construction, perfusion, access, and healing—yet none independently eliminates risk. Current evidence supports selective integration into practice while highlighting important gaps, including the need for standardized protocols and high-quality prospective trials to define their role in improving outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2947-9019
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Advances in Colorectal Anastomoses

Evangelos Messaris, Itzel Elizabeth Vidal-Sanchez
Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Advances in Colorectal Anastomoses

Evangelos Messaris, Itzel Elizabeth Vidal-Sanchez
article en

Abstract

Abstract Anastomotic leak (AL) remains a major source of morbidity in colorectal surgery, with leak rates showing little change despite advances in technique and perioperative care. This persistent risk has prompted the development of novel technologies and strategies targeting different aspects of anastomotic construction and healing. This article summarizes current evidence on emerging approaches, including compression and magnetic compression anastomosis (MCA), intraoperative fluorescence angiography (FA), robotic-assisted techniques, and modulation of the intestinal microbiome. These innovations vary substantially in maturity and clinical impact. Among device-based approaches, the nickel–titanium compression anastomosis ring is the most established compression device, with outcomes comparable to conventional stapling. In contrast, MCA remains limited in colorectal practice to a salvage role for recanalization of strictures and atresia rather than an alternative for primary anastomosis. FA has been evaluated extensively, with meta-analyses suggesting a potential reduction in AL rates, particularly for left-sided and low rectal anastomoses, although variability in its interpretation persists. Robotic platforms have facilitated intracorporeal anastomosis and expanded technical capabilities, while the intestinal microbiome has emerged as a modifiable factor influencing anastomotic healing; notably, combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation remains the only intervention with consistent clinical evidence of leak reduction. Together, these advances address complementary components of anastomotic success—construction, perfusion, access, and healing—yet none independently eliminates risk. Current evidence supports selective integration into practice while highlighting important gaps, including the need for standardized protocols and high-quality prospective trials to define their role in improving outcomes.

Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Advances in Colorectal Anastomoses — Evangelos Messaris, Itzel Elizabeth Vidal-Sanchez · Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS