Assessment of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills using a clinical simulation approach among emergency medical personnel of the Kerman Emergency and Incident Management Center

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a major public health and emergency medical challenge worldwide, with generally poor survival outcomes. The quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) provided by prehospital emergency personnel plays a critical role in improving outcomes. This study aimed to assess basic and advanced CPR skills among operational staff of the Kerman Emergency and Incident Management Center using a clinical simulation-based approach. This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 267 operational personnel, including emergency medical technicians (EMTs), nurses, and Red Crescent personnel, recruited using a census sampling method. CPR performance was assessed through a standardized adult cardiac arrest simulation using a newly developed 40-item CPR skills checklist based on the 2025 American Heart Association recommendations. The checklist covered key domains of basic life support (BLS) and advanced cardiac life support (ACLS). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and multiple linear regression. The overall mean CPR skill score was 85.67 ± 19.11 out of 120. A significant difference was observed among professional groups (F = 9.89, P < 0.001), with EMTs having the highest mean score (90.00 ± 19.08) and Red Crescent personnel the lowest (79.20 ± 18.58). EMTs scored significantly higher than Red Crescent personnel, whereas the difference between EMTs and nurses was not significant. Significant group differences were observed in airway opening, bag-valve-mask ventilation, arrhythmia recognition, defibrillation, and Alert, Voice, Pain, Unresponsive (AVPU) assessment. In the adjusted regression model, Red Crescent personnel had significantly lower CPR skill scores than nurses, while work experience was positively associated with CPR skill scores. CPR skill levels differed among professional groups. EMTs demonstrated higher overall performance than Red Crescent personnel, particularly in airway opening and BVM ventilation, while nurses demonstrated higher performance in arrhythmia recognition and defibrillation. These findings support the need for regular competency-based training, simulation-based assessment, and targeted reinforcement of CPR skills among prehospital emergency personnel.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Emergency Medicine
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-026-01372-1
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Assessment of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills using a clinical simulation approach among emergency medical personnel of the Kerman Emergency and Incident Management Center

Tayebeh Jalali, Mohadeseh Motamed‐Jahromi, Mohammad Aminizade, Ali Asadi et al.
International Journal of Emergency Medicine
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Assessment of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills using a clinical simulation approach among emergency medical personnel of the Kerman Emergency and Incident Management Center

Tayebeh Jalali, Mohadeseh Motamed‐Jahromi, Mohammad Aminizade, Ali Asadi, Vahid Faramarzpur, Golamreza Khademipur
article en

Abstract

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a major public health and emergency medical challenge worldwide, with generally poor survival outcomes. The quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) provided by prehospital emergency personnel plays a critical role in improving outcomes. This study aimed to assess basic and advanced CPR skills among operational staff of the Kerman Emergency and Incident Management Center using a clinical simulation-based approach. This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 267 operational personnel, including emergency medical technicians (EMTs), nurses, and Red Crescent personnel, recruited using a census sampling method. CPR performance was assessed through a standardized adult cardiac arrest simulation using a newly developed 40-item CPR skills checklist based on the 2025 American Heart Association recommendations. The checklist covered key domains of basic life support (BLS) and advanced cardiac life support (ACLS). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and multiple linear regression. The overall mean CPR skill score was 85.67 ± 19.11 out of 120. A significant difference was observed among professional groups (F = 9.89, P < 0.001), with EMTs having the highest mean score (90.00 ± 19.08) and Red Crescent personnel the lowest (79.20 ± 18.58). EMTs scored significantly higher than Red Crescent personnel, whereas the difference between EMTs and nurses was not significant. Significant group differences were observed in airway opening, bag-valve-mask ventilation, arrhythmia recognition, defibrillation, and Alert, Voice, Pain, Unresponsive (AVPU) assessment. In the adjusted regression model, Red Crescent personnel had significantly lower CPR skill scores than nurses, while work experience was positively associated with CPR skill scores. CPR skill levels differed among professional groups. EMTs demonstrated higher overall performance than Red Crescent personnel, particularly in airway opening and BVM ventilation, while nurses demonstrated higher performance in arrhythmia recognition and defibrillation. These findings support the need for regular competency-based training, simulation-based assessment, and targeted reinforcement of CPR skills among prehospital emergency personnel.

International Journal of Emergency MedicineVol. 19(1)
Kerman University of Medical Sciences (IR), Fasa University of Medical Sciences (IR)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.