Insight in Psychosis and Suicidality: A Scoping Review of a Paradoxical Relationship

Suicide is a serious public health concern and a major cause of premature mortality among individuals with psychotic disorders. Although several risk factors for suicide have been established, much remains unknown about how these factors generalize to populations experiencing psychosis. Existing literature has described an “insight paradox,” whereby improvements in insight have been associated with increased emotional distress. However, the extent to which insight is associated with suicide-related outcomes across psychotic disorders has not been comprehensively synthesized. This scoping review aimed to examine the relationship between insight and suicidality in psychosis, identify patterns and gaps within the literature, and summarize potential mechanisms underlying this association, with secondary consideration of illness stage. A scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, with 26 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Overall, greater insight was more frequently associated with increased suicidality than with null findings, although considerable heterogeneity existed across insight domains, suicide-related outcomes, and study methodologies. Notably, no study identified greater insight as a protective factor against suicidality. Findings suggest that interventions promoting insight should also address accompanying emotional and psychosocial challenges, such as self-stigma and hopelessness, and remain cognizant of associated suicidality risk. Future research should further clarify the mechanisms underlying the insight paradox.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychiatry International
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint7050206
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insight in Psychosis and Suicidality: A Scoping Review of a Paradoxical Relationship

Courtney N. Wiesepape, Marlee Gieselman, Jessica Garrelts
Psychiatry International
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Insight in Psychosis and Suicidality: A Scoping Review of a Paradoxical Relationship

Courtney N. Wiesepape, Marlee Gieselman, Jessica Garrelts
article en

Abstract

Suicide is a serious public health concern and a major cause of premature mortality among individuals with psychotic disorders. Although several risk factors for suicide have been established, much remains unknown about how these factors generalize to populations experiencing psychosis. Existing literature has described an “insight paradox,” whereby improvements in insight have been associated with increased emotional distress. However, the extent to which insight is associated with suicide-related outcomes across psychotic disorders has not been comprehensively synthesized. This scoping review aimed to examine the relationship between insight and suicidality in psychosis, identify patterns and gaps within the literature, and summarize potential mechanisms underlying this association, with secondary consideration of illness stage. A scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, with 26 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Overall, greater insight was more frequently associated with increased suicidality than with null findings, although considerable heterogeneity existed across insight domains, suicide-related outcomes, and study methodologies. Notably, no study identified greater insight as a protective factor against suicidality. Findings suggest that interventions promoting insight should also address accompanying emotional and psychosocial challenges, such as self-stigma and hopelessness, and remain cognizant of associated suicidality risk. Future research should further clarify the mechanisms underlying the insight paradox.

Psychiatry InternationalVol. 7(5)
Indiana State University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.