The effect of a procedural justice and deterrence-based letter on recidivism for smartphone use while driving in the Netherlands: a randomized controlled trial

This study evaluates the effectiveness of a Dutch police intervention conducted in March 2025 targeting drivers sanctioned for using a smartphone in traffic. As part of the intervention, individuals in the treatment group received a warning letter from the police incorporating elements of deterrence theory and procedural justice theory, in addition to the business as usual fine. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) design was employed to assess the intervention’s impact on specific and general recidivism. Offenders in the sample were assigned to either receiving the letter (treatment) or not (control). Specific and general recidivism were measured over a six-month follow-up period by comparing repeat offenses among offenders who received the letter with those who did not. Data were analyzed using negative binomial regression models. Results indicated no statistically significant differences between the treatment and control groups with respect to either form of recidivism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Police Practice and Research
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2026.2730015
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The effect of a procedural justice and deterrence-based letter on recidivism for smartphone use while driving in the Netherlands: a randomized controlled trial

Stijn Ruiter, Amy Nivette, Amina op de Weegh
Police Practice and Research
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

The effect of a procedural justice and deterrence-based letter on recidivism for smartphone use while driving in the Netherlands: a randomized controlled trial

Stijn Ruiter, Amy Nivette, Amina op de Weegh
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of a Dutch police intervention conducted in March 2025 targeting drivers sanctioned for using a smartphone in traffic. As part of the intervention, individuals in the treatment group received a warning letter from the police incorporating elements of deterrence theory and procedural justice theory, in addition to the business as usual fine. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) design was employed to assess the intervention’s impact on specific and general recidivism. Offenders in the sample were assigned to either receiving the letter (treatment) or not (control). Specific and general recidivism were measured over a six-month follow-up period by comparing repeat offenses among offenders who received the letter with those who did not. Data were analyzed using negative binomial regression models. Results indicated no statistically significant differences between the treatment and control groups with respect to either form of recidivism.

Police Practice and Research
Utrecht University (NL), Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The effect of a procedural justice and deterrence-based letter on recidivism for smartphone use while driving in the Netherlands: a randomized controlled trial — Stijn Ruiter, Amy Nivette, et al. · Police Practice and Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS