Efficacy and Safety of Sacituzumab Govitecan for Breast Cancer

Objectives: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate, has demonstrated clinical activity in HER2-negative breast cancer. Our meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SG compared with standard chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search across multiple databases for RCTs comparing SG with standard treatment in patients with breast cancer. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), disease control measures, and treatment-related adverse events. Hazard ratios (HRs), mean differences (MDs), and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were pooled using a random-effects model. Results: Six RCTs encompassing 2481 patients were included. SG significantly improved PFS ( HR =0.59), OS ( HR =0.63), and ORR ( RR =1.64) compared with chemotherapy. CBR was also significantly higher with SG ( RR =1.89), and the rate of progressive disease was significantly lower ( RR =0.62). Overall treatment-related adverse events were similar in both groups ( RR =1.05). Neutropenia and diarrhea were significantly more frequent in the SG group. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis shows that sacituzumab govitecan significantly improves PFS, OS, and ORR compared with standard chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer. Although associated with higher rates of neutropenia and diarrhea, its overall safety profile remains manageable. These results reinforce the role of SG as an effective treatment option for both metastatic TNBC and HR+/HER2− breast cancer and support its continued evaluation in earlier treatment settings and combination strategies, including immunotherapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/coc.0000000000001365
Primary Topic
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and Safety of Sacituzumab Govitecan for Breast Cancer

Debasrita Baidya, Muhammad Ayyan, Marharyta Khaustova, Breman A. Peethambar et al.
American Journal of Clinical Oncology
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
article

Efficacy and Safety of Sacituzumab Govitecan for Breast Cancer

Debasrita Baidya, Muhammad Ayyan, Marharyta Khaustova, Breman A. Peethambar, Asiya S. Chintala, Vutukuri Y. Kumar, Vanshika Bhardwaj, Lance G. Tolentino, Dalal Abdelrahim, Nnenna S.S. Ejiogu, Reham Z. Alrwaitey
article en

Abstract

Objectives: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate, has demonstrated clinical activity in HER2-negative breast cancer. Our meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SG compared with standard chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search across multiple databases for RCTs comparing SG with standard treatment in patients with breast cancer. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), disease control measures, and treatment-related adverse events. Hazard ratios (HRs), mean differences (MDs), and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were pooled using a random-effects model. Results: Six RCTs encompassing 2481 patients were included. SG significantly improved PFS ( HR =0.59), OS ( HR =0.63), and ORR ( RR =1.64) compared with chemotherapy. CBR was also significantly higher with SG ( RR =1.89), and the rate of progressive disease was significantly lower ( RR =0.62). Overall treatment-related adverse events were similar in both groups ( RR =1.05). Neutropenia and diarrhea were significantly more frequent in the SG group. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis shows that sacituzumab govitecan significantly improves PFS, OS, and ORR compared with standard chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer. Although associated with higher rates of neutropenia and diarrhea, its overall safety profile remains manageable. These results reinforce the role of SG as an effective treatment option for both metastatic TNBC and HR+/HER2− breast cancer and support its continued evaluation in earlier treatment settings and combination strategies, including immunotherapy.

American Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), King Edward Medical University (PK), University of Medical Sciences and Technology (SD), Ateneo de Manila University (PH), King Saud University (SA), University of Florida (US), International Teaching University of Georgia (GE), Regional Medical Center (US), University College London (GB), Kharkiv National Medical University (UA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.