Exercise for chronic pelvic pain in pre-menopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

In women, chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is recurrent or constant pain in the pelvis, lower abdominal region, and female organs that persists for longer than 6 months. Exercise has been effective for other chronic pain conditions and could potentially be effective for CPP. The objective was to evaluate if exercise is more effective than no intervention, minimal intervention or usual care for improving pain and quality of life (QOL) in the short, medium, and long-term in women of reproductive age with ongoing CPP of gynaecological or urological origin. Short-term pain was the primary endpoint. This was a systematic review with meta-analysis. Four databases were searched. Title/abstract, full-text screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were conducted by two independent authors. Risk of bias was measured using the Cochrane risk of bias 2.0 tool. For pain, scales were converted to a standardised 0 to 10 scale, with a smallest clinically worthwhile effect of 1.5 points. For QOL, scales were converted to a Standardised Mean difference (SMD). Random effects meta-analyses were used, and GRADE syntheses were performed. We identified 9319 records. Six studies ( n = 333) were included. All studies were high risk of bias. Two studies included yoga as an exercise modality, while the remaining used multiple exercise types. Comparators included advice, medication, or usual care. For pain, the evidence was very uncertain that exercise was better than the comparator and the effect was clinically worthwhile in the short- (MD: -2.74, 95%CI: -3.70 to -1.78, 4 studies) and long-term (MD: -3.38, 95%CI: -4.80 to -1.96, 2 studies). For QOL, the evidence was very uncertain that exercise was better than the comparator in the short- (SMD: 0.64, 95%CI: 0.08 to 1.19, 3 studies) and long-term (SMD: 1.12, 95%CI: 0.36 to 1.89, n = 31, 1 study). No studies investigated medium-term pain or QOL. The evidence was very uncertain for exercise on short-and long-term pain and QOL. Studies with low risk of bias are required to confirm these effects and to determine if any specific exercise modality is more effective. The protocol was pre-registered in Open Science Framework on May 31st, 2024 (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/FA3CR).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Women s Health
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-026-04847-8
Primary Topic
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exercise for chronic pelvic pain in pre-menopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Caroline Wanderley Souto Ferreira, Joshua Kahn, Peter W. Stubbs, Maiki Sun et al.
BMC Women s Health
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
article

Exercise for chronic pelvic pain in pre-menopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Caroline Wanderley Souto Ferreira, Joshua Kahn, Peter W. Stubbs, Maiki Sun, Isabella Warren, Ashleigh Abela, Olivia Hodgkinson
article en

Abstract

In women, chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is recurrent or constant pain in the pelvis, lower abdominal region, and female organs that persists for longer than 6 months. Exercise has been effective for other chronic pain conditions and could potentially be effective for CPP. The objective was to evaluate if exercise is more effective than no intervention, minimal intervention or usual care for improving pain and quality of life (QOL) in the short, medium, and long-term in women of reproductive age with ongoing CPP of gynaecological or urological origin. Short-term pain was the primary endpoint. This was a systematic review with meta-analysis. Four databases were searched. Title/abstract, full-text screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were conducted by two independent authors. Risk of bias was measured using the Cochrane risk of bias 2.0 tool. For pain, scales were converted to a standardised 0 to 10 scale, with a smallest clinically worthwhile effect of 1.5 points. For QOL, scales were converted to a Standardised Mean difference (SMD). Random effects meta-analyses were used, and GRADE syntheses were performed. We identified 9319 records. Six studies ( n = 333) were included. All studies were high risk of bias. Two studies included yoga as an exercise modality, while the remaining used multiple exercise types. Comparators included advice, medication, or usual care. For pain, the evidence was very uncertain that exercise was better than the comparator and the effect was clinically worthwhile in the short- (MD: -2.74, 95%CI: -3.70 to -1.78, 4 studies) and long-term (MD: -3.38, 95%CI: -4.80 to -1.96, 2 studies). For QOL, the evidence was very uncertain that exercise was better than the comparator in the short- (SMD: 0.64, 95%CI: 0.08 to 1.19, 3 studies) and long-term (SMD: 1.12, 95%CI: 0.36 to 1.89, n = 31, 1 study). No studies investigated medium-term pain or QOL. The evidence was very uncertain for exercise on short-and long-term pain and QOL. Studies with low risk of bias are required to confirm these effects and to determine if any specific exercise modality is more effective. The protocol was pre-registered in Open Science Framework on May 31st, 2024 (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/FA3CR).

BMC Women s Health
University of Technology Sydney (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (BR)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.