International climate finance and emission reductions: what do the last twenty years tell us?

Abstract We empirically examine the impact of international climate finance transfers on recipient countries’ carbon emissions. We analyse the effect of mitigation and adaptation finance using emission data of 164 non-OECD countries from 2000 to 2017. We use a distributed lag model in first differences, a panel method that allows us to abstract from possible feedback from current emissions to future transfers. We address potential reverse causality while accounting for dynamic effects. We control for other factors that could be correlated with both climate finance flows and emissions. Contrary to expectations, we find that public mitigation finance tends to increase emissions, potentially due to some misreporting of development aid as climate finance. Public adaptation finance appears to drive an even greater increase in emissions. We explain this by the energy-intensive nature of adaptation measures. Transfers under the Clean Development Mechanism reduce emissions modestly after five years.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Development Economics
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x26100679
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

International climate finance and emission reductions: what do the last twenty years tell us?

Claire Gavard, Niklas Schoch
Environment and Development Economics
International Development and Aid
article

International climate finance and emission reductions: what do the last twenty years tell us?

Claire Gavard, Niklas Schoch
article en

Abstract

Abstract We empirically examine the impact of international climate finance transfers on recipient countries’ carbon emissions. We analyse the effect of mitigation and adaptation finance using emission data of 164 non-OECD countries from 2000 to 2017. We use a distributed lag model in first differences, a panel method that allows us to abstract from possible feedback from current emissions to future transfers. We address potential reverse causality while accounting for dynamic effects. We control for other factors that could be correlated with both climate finance flows and emissions. Contrary to expectations, we find that public mitigation finance tends to increase emissions, potentially due to some misreporting of development aid as climate finance. Public adaptation finance appears to drive an even greater increase in emissions. We explain this by the energy-intensive nature of adaptation measures. Transfers under the Clean Development Mechanism reduce emissions modestly after five years.

Environment and Development Economics
Centre for European Economic Research (DE), Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris (FR)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

International climate finance and emission reductions: what do the last twenty years tell us? — Claire Gavard, Niklas Schoch · Environment and Development Economics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS